Quick Answer
Book editing costs $0.005–$0.10 per word depending on the type; here’s how to find, vet, and hire the right editor without getting scammed. (Updated May 2026.)
Updated May 2026.
book editing services and costs
Why you should get your book manuscript edited
Getting your book edited helps you have a better book. You are putting out a product, that will be enjoyed and judged. The easiest thing to ruin an otherwise good book is a typo or two. They’re hard to avoid with tens of thousands of words, but more than a couple and you’ll get bad amazon reviews like “should have hired an editor”. Those reviews never go away, and can kill book sales. Typos and spelling errors mar your credibility as a professional author. In my first book, I wrote “Thrown” instead of “Throne”. Twice. One reader was so put off about it, he trolled comments about my book and kept repeating how awful this was. Although people are becoming more tolerant (I regularly find a few typos in trade-published books) and are willing to stretch the limits for indie authors, you don’t want to come off as unprofessional.The difference between editing and proofreading
Proofreading is when someone goes through your book quickly looking for mistakes. Typos, punctuation errors, spelling problems. Mistakes are clear and easy to fix (if they can be found). Sometimes you can find a proofreading service that is cheaper than editing, so if you’re sure this is all you need, you can save some money (but I advise against it.) You can also just use a tool like Grammarly – the “free” version with “correctness” only will catch most issues. A good editor, on the other hand, will do all of that but also fix and rewrite poorly worded phrases, sentence structure – so they are actually improving your writing and tidying things up. They will cut out (or “flag” with comments) any big problems.
(Note, some people will offer editing only but not proofreading, so make sure you know what they are doing for you. I prefer “all-in-one” services that just fix everything they can).
When I was doing full time proofreading, besides heavily editing text, I would leave around 10 comments on each page with content critique: characterization problems, plot twists, repetitive words, paragraphs or chapters with no purpose, character motivation, etc.
These are not things that can be “fixed” without a substantial rewrite – so the best I could do is leave a comment to share some writing wisdom.
Unfortunately, this leads into a rather big problem:
If you pay for a good book editor, you will need to rewrite.
Almost all authors think editing is the final stage before publication. They want someone to clean up their text so they can sell it.
However, the biggest problems with your book are not the typos – it’s the story.
If you had paid for someone to do a manuscript critique of your book, you would get tons of feedback on how to improve the story (which would be bad news, because you were excited about finishing and now you see all these new problems to fix).
Of course you don’t have to fix anything – but a better story will outsell a clean manuscript.
I used to feel bad, knowing I was helping authors improve their book but at the same time knowing they had lots of work to do, and that after rewriting, they would need to hire another editor.
Many authors feel grateful, but also overwhelmed, when they realize their first draft actually needs a lot more work and isn’t ready to be published.
What you need to do first – fix the story!
Join a book club or writing group. Avoid your friends and family – they won’t give you tough, critical advice (OK, some will… but it’s tough to know who is and who isn’t). You can easily set up a group on Craigslist in your city. Get five or so aspiring writers to agree to criticize each other’s work honestly. While you can ignore 1 or 2 criticisms from different people, if several people flag the same issues, you probably need to change it. Authors are bad at handling criticism. They think they know best, because they understand things better than readers. Don’t be stubborn – listen to feedback (readers will never see the story as YOU see the story; and if they don’t get it, it’s because you haven’t written it well enough yet). Questions to ask yourself:- What’s the point of my book? Who will read and enjoy it?
- What happens? What’s the one, driving plot conflict?
- Are all my characters motivated in their choices? Or do they just do random stuff because they are really emotional (check how often your characters “burst into tears” or sob or whatnot. Over-emotional characters are weak and unbelievable.)
How much should you pay for editing and proofreading?
I used to charge between 1.5cents and 2cents per word ($0.02USD/word). I still feel that 2 cents per word is average, or “reasonable”. So a 50,000 word book would cost $1000. That’s a big, scary fee – which is why I was uncomfortable charging more. However, I stopped editing, in part, because it’s way too much work for the money. So if you’re looking for a super quality editor, 2cents per word might be too low (you couldn’t buy me at that price, and I’m awesome). These days, although I rarely take on editing work, I would have to charge at least 4 cents per word ($2000 for 50,000words). But I know editors who charge 4, 5, and 6 cents per word as well. I don’t think they are better editors than I am, but they may have a better business model that allows them to charge more; they may also be better suited to certain projects than I am. Edit: now that I have my PhD in Literature, I prefer only taking on developmental critiques closer to 8cents a word, or ghostwriting at 12 cents per word. Q: How much do novel editors charge? A: The cost of hiring a novel editor can vary depending on factors such as the level of editing required, the length of the manuscript, and the editor’s experience and expertise. Editing fees are usually calculated based on a per-word or per-hour basis. As a general range, developmental editing may cost between $0.03 and $0.15 per word, copy editing between $0.01 and $0.05 per word, and line editing between $0.02 and $0.08 per word. It’s advisable to request quotes from multiple editors and discuss your specific project requirements to get an accurate estimate. Remember, it’s essential to communicate openly with potential editors, discuss your goals and expectations, and clarify pricing and services before entering into any agreement. Hiring a professional editor can greatly enhance the quality of your book, but finding the right editor and understanding the associated costs are important steps in the process.Price can fluctuate widely for book editing
You can *also* find great editors for much less. Experienced authors often pay $.01 or less, because they’ve done the work and found great book editors. But also because, they probably write cleaner drafts that just need some light tweaks or proofreading. Unfortunately, it’s a challenge to vet qualified editors (I’ve hired several people with advanced degrees and great qualifications that just didn’t put in the work to do a good job). Editors aren’t usually business owners; they’re freelancers. They have to have a website and get traffic or figure out advertising, or compete on freelance marketplaces for “gigs” often while dropping their prices.
- Proofreaders are great at finding typos and inconsistencies.
- Line-editors improve the flow and word choice to make the writing more smooth.
- Copy-editors are meant to clean things up before publishing
- Developmental editors focus on big-picture story stuff.
Is your book ready for editing?
Another common question is, how many rounds of edits and revisions should an author do before their book is ready for editing? This depends on the author. I have a 5-step book editing system I also do for my own books. I start with the story, and making sure the plot is all there. I use my 24 chapter plot outline. Then I go through and fix pacing, character motivations, logistics – so it makes sense and feels like there’s natural progression between each scene. Then I go through and add more dialogue, more scene description, tighten up sentences, avoid repetition. Finally, I do a proofread and add final touches, fix the slow or in-between scenes, give the final conclusion more emotional satisfaction. Writing and editing books is always a messy process, but that’s helped me finish nearly 20 novels. You can learn the important skills you need to tell better stories, without hiring an editor – and I would recommend you do so, but it will take more time, effort and patience. And I would always do a careful check with grammarly before you send it to anyone else, to fix basic punctuation and grammar issues.-
- ProWritingAid (editing)
- Grammarly (proofreading)
- Quillbot (revising)
- Multiple revisions: You have gone through several rounds of self-editing and made substantial improvements to the manuscript.
- Feedback from beta readers: You have received feedback from trusted beta readers or critique partners and have addressed their suggestions and concerns.
- Polished prose: Your writing has been carefully revised for clarity, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
- Solid story structure: Your plot, character development, and pacing are well-crafted, and there are no major plot holes or inconsistencies.
- Objective perspective: You have gained some distance from the manuscript and can approach it with a more critical eye, recognizing the need for external input.
Q: How much do editors change your novel?
A: The level of changes made by an editor can vary depending on several factors, including the type of editing you choose and the specific needs of your manuscript. Here’s a general breakdown:- Developmental editing: A developmental editor focuses on big-picture elements such as plot, character development, pacing, and overall structure. They may suggest significant revisions, additions, or deletions to enhance the story. Changes at this stage can be more substantial.
- Copy editing: Copy editors primarily address grammar, punctuation, spelling, and consistency. They focus on the sentence level and strive to improve clarity, style, and readability. Changes made by copy editors are typically more minor and fine-tuning oriented.
- Line editing: Line editors dig deeper into the language, style, and flow of your writing. They refine sentence structure, word choice, and paragraph transitions to enhance the overall quality of the prose. Changes at this stage are focused on improving the writing style.
How to choose an editor or proofreader
Now comes the hard part, actually picking someone to work with. Here are some things I would suggest:- Ask on online forums or chatrooms for recommendations by other authors
- Check out their website and prices (factor in some of the items above – are you paying for their service or for their lifestyle?)
- Ask for a free sample. Most editors will offer this, if not, ask. For a book, try to get at least 5 pages free. Don’t “trick” them by planting a few mistakes (or do if you want) – focus on how they can improve your regular text.
- Do this for at least 3 – in the process you’ll also get a chance to see how they respond to emails and treat clients. Your “feeling” about the person is important – although not as important as their skills. A nice person may not be the best editor (I’m kind of grouchy and my customer service is lack-luster. But my aloofness helps me concentrate on improving the text and catching mistakes). Often very enthusiastic, supportive editors are must more motivated to get your money. But some people are just friendly.
- Find 10 writers with amazing books in your genre or subject matter and ask if they’d recommend their editor.
Things to Avoid when Choosing a Book Editor
I used to have a big list of services I recommend… I took it down. It’s very hard to vet professional editors. I try to hire good ones for my own book editing company and it’s a challenge to shift through their work history and websites and try to find some good reviews or case studies. In the end it’s mostly about the confident editor who says they can do it, which is not an indicator of quality but you won’t find that out until later. I wish there was one good service I could whole-heartedly recommend, but the good, cheap editors are usually booked out in advance by big authors who publish frequently and understand the value. Red flags – by wary of vanity presses who offer to publish you, but you need to pay for editing first. Also be wary of vanity or boutique presses in general, which offer a publishing package that includes everything AND editing together. You’re paying double for hand-holding and product management… which is totally fine if you need some help – unless they are outsourcing to low-quality service providers, in which case, one little messup can wreck your launch plans (mostly, they’ll give you an offbrand or unprofessional book cover and the book cover is everything.)Should I sign a contract for book editing?
I tend to be optimistic and have high expectations of people. But contracts are often useful for protecting an editor and making sure the client and editor agree on the exact amount of work to be done, at what price – without one, clients can keep requesting more work and the editor can be taken advantage of. A professional editor will probably want some kind of contract. Authors often also want an NDA agreement signed, which I don’t think is necessary. But I’m not a lawyer and you probably shouldn’t listen to me. (Though, nearly everybody else will tell you this as well: don’t demand an NDA so people won’t steal your idea.) If someone steals your work to publish as their own, which I think is unlikely, there are some things you can do about it. But try to remember, plagiarism and piracy is not the enemy. Obscurity is the enemy. The risk that your book will never be found, seen or read – that’s roughly an 85% statistical chance. That’s the norm. So worrying about some unethical editor deciding your book is so great they’re going to quit their job, ruin their business and steal your idea well… it almost never happens. While I’m at it, contracts don’t help much when an editor ghosts you – which happens a lot, and unfortunately there’s not a lot you can do. This is the nature of working with 1-person businesses who are their own boss. Most are excellent. But there is a little bit of risk involved so do your research and don’t just pick someone who you “gel” with (I have another post somewhere in the universe, that says something like – finding someone who does a good job is more important than how someone makes you feel).Another way to find book editors
Another excellent way to find editors is to let them come to you. Join a site like Elance, Guru, or Freelancer, and post a project. Be specific about what you need, and include a price range/budget. You’ll receive probably around 20~50 responses. Choosing one can be difficult, but you can read through their testimonials, look over their portfolio, etc. This is usually how editors start building experience, before they launch their own site, so you might save some money by catching them early in their career (at the same time, they may have less experience….). At any rate, you usually aren’t required to choose someone for your project, so you could just use the process to get in touch with a few good options. Most sites like this don’t support free samples, but if you find a way to contact the editors directly by email, I’m sure they’d agree to a sample edit.Reedsy Book Editors
Reedsy is a marketplace of author and publishing services. It’s a well built and useful site for authors, and it makes finding editors easier. They don’t post their prices however, and it’s not super intuitive. Many people have been happy with the editors they found; but I’ve also heard some negative reviews. Reedsy tries to vet editors and protect authors (more than most sites) but as I mentioned, vetting editors is very difficult.Do I really need to pay to edit my book?
I don’t think it’s fair to tell someone they cannot publish because they don’t have enough disposable income to hire an editor. And there are books that have sold very well without proper editing – so I’ve learned that editing is not necessarily a sound financial investment: it won’t make or break a book’s success. It’s a good idea, and of course it will help, if you can afford it. But if you can’t, I don’t think you should take out a loan expecting your book to earn a windfall on publishing. If you can’t afford an editor: I fixed my books by getting reader feedback and asking my beta-readers to highlight or flag typos. If you have a committed group of betas, before you release the book out to strangers or make it available, you might be fine. I would still get the recommended “Free Samples” from a few editors though. If they can’t find anything to fix, you probably don’t need to pay for an editor. But they will probably show you how much you actually need to fix. 5 typos in a whole book is not the end of the world. 50 mistakes will probably upset readers and lose fans. Join writing groups, trade edits and critiques, find a way to get some fresh eyes on your book – and be open to criticism (though you don’t have to accept all if it, it’s always helpful to see how others will react to your writing).Can you self-edit your book
If you’re still here, you may feel like I’ve failed to give you the information you need (because damn, you just want to hire the best editor and wash your hands of the dumpster fire of your manuscript that’s side-eyeing you balefully from the desk). But here’s the good news. The absolute best thing you should do with your rough draft is to roll up your sleeves and invest some time in the craft of writing. Yes it’s harder, than the free-wheeling inspiration that vomited up your joyful draft… because you’ll have to learn some stuff. And the more you learn, the more you’ll see flaws and cracks and just objectively terrible writing in your book and that can sting. But it’s also part of the process. I’ve tried to make that process easier by creating an absolute ton of writing materials and resources for authors; and it’s not recycled garbage either. This is stuff you’ve never heard before, that didn’t exist before. I made it for you. Here’s just a small taste but you really need to dig around to find my best resources. You’re welcome to stay as long as you like. I’ll even put the kettle on.How to self-edit your book for almost free
#1 use Grammarly to find typos. #2 find and fix plotholes with my story plotting templates #3 show don’t tell (3 simple rules to fix everything) #4 common writing mistakes (you are definitely making most of these…) #5 fix your backstory/infodumps (write satisfying fiction) Get started with those… I spend 10 years getting a PhD and another ten years in the industry to begin to start understanding this stuff, and now I share it with writers for free. But this is just the very beginning. I have a lot of content, so you might have to dig around a bit to find my best content, or check out one of my writing courses (one of them on “self-editing” is free, so grab that one while you can!)- How to write a book in a month (34 easy steps!)
- The 6 signs of weak writing (how to tell if your book sucks)
Best writing and editing software
There are some very new, cutting-edge software that uses AI, that I think will replace proofreaders and maybe even developmental editors very soon. It’s already pretty smart, and can do basic things like fix grammar, spelling and punctuation; rephrase or rewrite your text in a stronger style, even change the POV or tenses. You can even ask it to give you critical feedback. There’s a lot of controversy, because this is a big change, but some of these tools could save you a lot of time and money, and make book writing more accessible to everyone. As a last resort, I try to collect great editors at The Book Butchers. We aren’t perfect, but we’re pretty great, and we have a better guarantee than anybody else so you’re always protected.
PS. This is an older article. A newer one comparing book editing prices is “how much does editing cost and are you being ripped off?”
The 4 Types of Editing (And Why Order Matters)
Most authors don’t get scammed by editors. They get scammed by their own confusion about what kind of edit they’re paying for. So before you hire anyone, you have to understand the four different jobs.
These are not interchangeable. They happen in a specific order. If you skip ahead, you end up paying twice for work that should have been done once.
Developmental editing is the architect. This is the editor reading your manuscript as a whole story and asking the hard questions: Is the protagonist’s arc actually working? Does the second act sag? Are these three subplots earning their place? Is the ending paying off the setup? You get a long editorial letter (10–30 pages is normal) and sometimes margin notes flagging structural problems. You don’t get line-by-line cleanup. You get a roadmap for revising the next draft. Sometimes a developmental editor reframes the whole project — “this is actually a romance pretending to be a thriller, and you’d sell ten times more if you leaned into that.” That kind of feedback is worth thousands.
Line editing is the prose surgeon. This is sentence-level work: rhythm, flow, voice, awkward phrasing, clichés, repeated structures, weak verbs, paragraphs that drift. The line editor isn’t fixing your plot. She’s making your prose sound like itself, only sharper. A good line edit is the difference between a manuscript that reads competent and a manuscript that reads like a real writer wrote it. You typically see tracked changes throughout, plus margin comments explaining the why.
Copyediting is the rules person. This is mechanical work: grammar, punctuation, capitalization, hyphenation, consistency (Mary’s eyes are blue on page 12 and brown on page 84 — flag), style-sheet enforcement (CMOS, AP, house style), continuity, fact-checking light claims. It is not creative. It is corrective. A copyeditor will not rewrite your sentences for style. She will catch the comma splice on page 142 that nobody else noticed.
Proofreading is the final sweep. This happens after the book is formatted, on the actual proof — print PDF or EPUB. The proofreader is hunting typos that survived three passes, layout glitches, widows, orphans, broken hyphens, weird page breaks, and the occasional “teh” that nobody saw. Proofreading is not editing. It is quality control on a finished file.
Here’s the part most authors get wrong. You can’t proofread your way out of a structural problem. No copyeditor in the world can fix a third act that doesn’t earn its ending. If your beta readers say “I got bored around chapter 14,” paying $2,000 for a copyedit will not save the book. You need a developmental edit, or at least a manuscript critique, before anyone touches the prose.
Order matters. Always: developmental → line → copy → proof. Skip a stage only if you’ve genuinely already done the work yourself and you know it.
2026 Book Editing Costs (Real Numbers)
Editors hate the per-word question because it flattens a lot of nuance. Authors love it because it’s the only number you can actually budget against. Here’s what real freelance book editors charge in 2026, based on the Editorial Freelancers Association rate survey, Reedsy marketplace data, and a decade of watching prices climb.
| Edit type | 2026 per-word range | 80,000-word novel | 100,000-word novel | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developmental edit | $0.04 – $0.10 | $3,200 – $8,000 | $4,000 – $10,000 | 10–30 page editorial letter, margin notes, structural roadmap. |
| Line edit | $0.02 – $0.06 | $1,600 – $4,800 | $2,000 – $6,000 | Tracked changes throughout, voice/rhythm/clarity work. |
| Copyedit | $0.01 – $0.03 | $800 – $2,400 | $1,000 – $3,000 | Grammar, consistency, style sheet, continuity. |
| Proofread | $0.005 – $0.015 | $400 – $1,200 | $500 – $1,500 | Typo sweep on formatted proof. |
| Manuscript critique | flat fee | $250 – $1,500 | $400 – $2,000 | Editorial letter only, no margin notes. Cheaper than full dev edit. |
| Beta read with written feedback | flat fee | $50 – $300 | $50 – $400 | Reader reactions, not prose work. |
EFA 2026 medians (fiction): developmental 3.0–3.5¢/word, line 2.7–3.5¢, copy 2.0–2.7¢, proof 1.2–2.0¢. Reedsy 2026 averages: developmental ~3.6¢/word, copy ~2.7¢, proofreading ~2.0¢, editorial assessment ~2.6¢. Hourly: EFA reports developmental editors at $55–$95/hour and copyeditors at $45–$75/hour.
Nonfiction is more expensive than fiction across the board (figure 30–50% more), and academic, medical, or technical work runs higher still — copyediting STEM material can hit $0.05/word because it requires subject-matter expertise.
The total picture for a single 80K novel through all four passes: about $6,000–$16,400 at the high quality end, $4,400–$8,400 at the working median. That’s the real cost of a fully professional production. If that number gives you sticker shock — good. It should. It’s also why most indie authors mix and match: developmental + copyedit only, or critique + line + proofread, or any combination that fits the budget without skipping the structural work.
A common mistake: paying $0.005/word and assuming you got the same edit you would have gotten at $0.04/word. You did not. Cheap rates almost always mean less time, less expertise, or AI assistance. Sometimes that’s fine for a short story. It is not fine for a novel you’re charging readers for.
Where to Find Legit Book Editors (2026)
This is the part where most “how to find a book editor” articles dump twenty platform names with no actual judgment. Here’s the honest version, with what each one is good for and where each one fails.
| Platform | Pricing | Quality control | Best for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reedsy | Premium ($$$) | Strong vetting, traditional-pub backgrounds | Authors who want a curated marketplace, willing to pay for it | Higher rates than direct hire; some editors charge a Reedsy markup |
| Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA) | Variable ($–$$$) | Member-only directory, no acceptance test but professional standards | Searching by genre, contacting editors directly, no platform middleman | You vet credentials yourself; range of experience is wide |
| Editor World | Mid ($$) | In-house vetting, transparent pricing from $0.021/word | Authors who want clear pricing and to choose the editor before paying | Smaller editor pool than Reedsy |
| NY Book Editors | Premium ($$$) | Curated team, agency model | Authors who want a full-service experience, hand-holding included | Pricier, less choice |
| ServiceScape | Mid ($$) | Less curation, larger pool | Quick turnaround, multiple editing types | Quality varies more than curated platforms |
| Bookerly | Mid ($$) | Newer platform, growing | Authors who want a Reedsy alternative without the queue | Smaller editor base, less track record |
| CIEP (Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading) | Variable | Tiered membership with a real exam at higher levels | Finding credentialed copyeditors and proofreaders | Skews UK-based |
| ACES: The Society for Editing | Variable | Professional org with directory | US-based copyeditors with newsroom or publishing experience | Less fiction-focused |
| Upwork | Wide range ($–$$$) | None — it’s a marketplace | Repeat short-form work, copyeditors you can audition | Massive variance; AI-generated proposals; do a sample edit |
| Fiverr | Cheap ($) | None | Low-stakes proofreading on short pieces | Lots of people calling themselves “professional editors” who aren’t |
| Local university MFA programs | Cheap ($) | Word of mouth | Affordable developmental help from grad students who are sharper than you’d expect | No contracts, no formal process |
| Acknowledgements pages | Whatever the editor charges | The book itself is the proof | Finding editors with experience in your exact genre | You have to chase them down |
The best move I can give you, if you have time: read three or four published books in your genre that read the way you want yours to read. Open the Acknowledgements page. Find the editor’s name. Search them. About 60% of the time they’ll have a website and they’ll be available for freelance work. That is the highest-signal way to find a book editor. The author already vetted them. The book itself is the proof.
If you don’t have time for that, Reedsy and the EFA are the two strongest starting points. Reedsy if you want the platform to do some of the vetting for you. EFA if you want to talk to editors directly without a marketplace fee.
Avoid any “service” that won’t tell you who is actually editing your book. If they assign your manuscript to an anonymous editor in a content mill, the work will read like a content mill produced it.
How to Vet an Editor (Don’t Get Scammed)
Vetting an editor is mostly common sense, but it’s the kind of common sense people skip because they’re excited to have someone — anyone — say yes to their book. Don’t skip this.
1. Get a sample edit. Send 1–2 pages and ask for a sample. Most working editors will do this for free or for a small fee. The sample tells you almost everything: tone, depth of feedback, whether they actually understand your genre. If someone refuses to sample, walk away. They’re either too busy or hiding something.
2. Check genre experience. A literary fiction editor and a thriller editor are different animals. Ask: “What books in my genre have you worked on?” Then verify. If they say they edited a book, find that book on Amazon and confirm.
3. Read their own writing. If an editor has a blog, a website, or social media, read it. If their own prose is sloppy, they cannot edit yours. This sounds harsh. It’s also true.
4. Ask for client references. Email two of their previous clients. Ask: “Was the timeline accurate? Was the feedback useful? Would you hire this editor again?” Most authors are happy to answer.
5. Confirm turnaround in writing. Real editors give you a delivery date and stick to it. Vague timelines (“a few weeks”) are a red flag. Get the date in the contract.
6. Read the contract carefully. A real freelance editor uses a contract. It should specify: scope (which type of edit), turnaround date, total fee, payment schedule, what happens if you need a second pass, what happens if either party cancels. If they don’t have a contract, they’re not professional. Move on.
7. Split the payment. Standard practice: 50% on signing, 50% on delivery. Be wary of anyone demanding 100% up front for a long project. That’s a scam structure.
8. Sniff for AI. This is the new red flag. Some “editors” in 2026 are quietly running your manuscript through ChatGPT and selling you the output. Tells: vague feedback that doesn’t mention specific scenes, generic praise that gets your genre wrong, sample edits that read like grammar-tool suggestions, no margin notes that show actual reading.
9. Reverse-search them. Google “[Editor Name] scam” and “[Editor Name] complaints.” Also check Writer Beware, the Absolute Write forums, and r/writing for any history. This takes ten minutes and has saved a lot of authors from a lot of money.
10. Trust your gut on tone. If the editor’s emails feel pushy, dismissive, condescending, or culty, they will be that way during the edit. The relationship is a relationship. You are about to spend three months exchanging notes with this person about your book. Don’t pick someone you don’t want to talk to.
AI Editing Tools (When They Replace vs Supplement Editors)
This question dominates writing forums in 2026, and the honest answer is messier than either side wants. AI is not “replacing editors.” AI is also not “useless.” Here is what each AI tool actually does, and when it earns its keep.
ProWritingAid — the strongest editing tool I’ve used. It runs your manuscript through about 25 different reports (overused words, sentence variety, repeats, sticky sentences, passive voice, dialogue tags, pacing). For long-form fiction, it’s significantly better than Grammarly. It will not replace a line editor, but it will catch enough mid-tier prose problems that your line editor can focus on the harder stuff. Worth the subscription if you’re writing books.
Grammarly — best for short pieces, business writing, and emails. The free version is a solid copyedit-lite tool. Premium is reasonable. For long fiction, ProWritingAid is sharper. Use Grammarly when you need a quick pass; use ProWritingAid for manuscripts.
Hemingway — the cleanup tool. It flags sentences that are too long, too dense, full of adverbs, written in passive voice. Useful for tightening a draft before you hand it off. Not a replacement for any human editor, but a real friend during self-editing.
Sudowrite, Novelcrafter, Claude, ChatGPT — these are drafting and brainstorming partners, not editors. They can rewrite a paragraph, generate twenty alternative chapter openings, or suggest a structural pivot. They will not give you a developmental edit on a novel because they don’t actually read the way a human reads. They pattern-match. That’s useful for getting unstuck. It is not the same as an editor who has worked on 200 books and recognizes that your chapter 9 is a bait-and-switch the reader won’t forgive.
Free supplements I’d start with: the grammar checker, the editor and proofreader tool, and the AI checker at /apps/. Use them before you spend money on a copyedit. They’ll clean up enough of the mechanical errors that a human copyeditor isn’t billing you for fixing your obvious typos.
My honest 2026 take. AI tools have cut the floor cost of a copyedit roughly in half — meaning a manuscript that used to need $2,000 of copyediting often comes in cleaner now and needs $1,000 instead. AI tools have not replaced developmental editors, line editors, or human copyeditors at the high end. Story-level judgment is still beyond what any pattern-matching system can fake. The authors who win in 2026 use AI to remove drudgework and pay humans for judgment. The ones who use AI to skip humans entirely produce books that read like everything else on Amazon Kindle Unlimited — fine on the surface, hollow underneath.
Self-Edit vs Hire Editor (Decision Matrix)
You don’t need every type of editor every time. Here’s the matrix that actually works, based on what stage of writing career you’re in and what kind of book you’re publishing.
| Situation | Recommended editing pipeline | Rough cost (80K novel) |
|---|---|---|
| Blog post, short story, low-stakes content | Self-edit + AI cleanup. | $0 – $50 |
| First novel, traditional submission | Developmental + line + copy + proof. The full suite. | $6,000 – $16,400 |
| First novel, indie publish, tight budget | Manuscript critique + copyedit + proofread (skip line). | $1,500 – $4,000 |
| Book #2 or #3 in a series, indie author | Copyedit + proofread. Self-edit the prose. | $1,200 – $3,600 |
| Book #5+ in a tight genre series, confident author | Copyedit only, or proofread only. | $400 – $2,400 |
| Memoir or nonfiction, first time | Developmental + line + copy + proof. Nonfiction is unforgiving. | $7,000 – $18,000 |
| Children’s picture book | Critique + proofread. Word counts are tiny. | $200 – $600 |
| Academic or technical book | Specialist developmental + STEM copyedit. | $6,000 – $20,000+ |
The honest rule: for your first novel, hire a developmental editor or pay for a manuscript critique. The reason isn’t pride — it’s pattern recognition. You’re inside your own book. You can’t see the structural mistakes. A pro reader can tell you in two weeks what would otherwise take five years and three flopped launches to figure out.
By book five, you’ve internalized most of those structural lessons. You can self-edit at a level that didn’t exist when you wrote book one. You still need a copyeditor (because nobody catches their own typos), but you don’t necessarily need to drop $5,000 on a developmental every time.
Deeper guide on doing the prose work yourself before paying anyone: 25 self-editing tips for indie authors.
Editing Timeline (How Long It Takes)
Editors don’t work as fast as you want them to. They work as fast as the manuscript allows. Here are realistic 2026 timelines for a 70,000–100,000-word novel, assuming the editor isn’t booked solid.
Developmental edit: 4–6 weeks. A developmental editor reads the manuscript twice (once for impressions, once with notes), drafts the editorial letter, marks up structural problems, and often does a follow-up call. Pace is roughly 250–1,500 words per hour, which works out to 53–320 working hours on an 80K novel. Anyone promising a full developmental in two weeks is either skimming or running it through AI.
Line edit: 3–5 weeks. Line editors work at 1,000–2,500 words per hour. An 80K manuscript is 32–80 hours of focused work, plus a follow-up pass.
Copyedit: 2–3 weeks. Copyeditors run at roughly 2,000 words per hour for fiction, faster for clean manuscripts and slower for messy ones. An 80K novel is about 40 hours.
Proofread: 1–2 weeks. Proofreaders work at 2,000–4,000 words per hour. An 80K proof is 20–40 hours.
Author rest between passes: 1–2 weeks. You need to step away after each round of feedback before you start revising, or you’ll either over-correct or under-correct. This is real time, not lazy time.
Editor queue time: 2–12 weeks. Good editors are booked. Reedsy editors with strong reviews often have a 4–8 week queue. EFA editors vary wildly. Plan ahead.
Realistic full pipeline for a finished first draft to publish-ready manuscript: 4–6 months if everything moves fast and you only do two or three passes; 8–12 months if you’re doing the full developmental → line → copy → proof suite with revisions in between.
If your timeline is “I need this edited by next Friday” — you don’t need an editor, you need a different book. Or you need to lower expectations about the edit. Cheap, fast, good: pick two.
Red Flags That Mean “Don’t Hire This Editor”
I’ve seen authors lose $500 to $5,000 to bad editors in the last two years. Almost every case had at least one of these red flags visible up front. Spot them. Walk away.
1. Rate under $0.005/word with no explanation. That’s $400 for an 80K novel. Real editing takes 30+ hours. Nobody who is good at this works for $13/hour. Either it’s a student practicing, an AI dump, or a scam.
2. No website, no portfolio, no traceable history. A real freelance editor has at least a one-page site with credentials and rates. If you can’t find anything about them, that’s a problem.
3. Refuses to do a sample edit. Even paid samples are normal. A blanket refusal means they don’t want you to see the work before paying.
4. Demands 100% payment up front. Standard is 50/50 or 30/40/30. Anyone wanting all the money before they touch the manuscript is structuring the deal so they can disappear.
5. Vague turnaround. “A few weeks” is not a date. Real editors give you a specific delivery day in writing.
6. “I’ll edit your book for free if you give me credit / a testimonial / a percentage of royalties.” This is sometimes a scam, sometimes a desperate beginner. Either way: not a real arrangement. Editing is paid work.
7. Guarantees that aren’t theirs to make. “I’ll get your book to bestseller.” “I’ll guarantee an agent.” “Editors at HarperCollins will love this.” None of those are an editor’s call. Anyone making them is selling fantasy.
8. AI-generated samples. Tells: feedback that names a wrong genre, compliments specific scenes that don’t exist, uses bland phrases like “compelling narrative” and “engaging prose” with no specifics, no margin notes that reference exact lines from your book.
9. Unsolicited cold pitches that quote your book. New 2026 scam: someone emails you saying “I read your draft and loved chapter three.” You never sent them a draft. They scraped a sample off your blog or used AI to fake reading. Block.
10. Pressure tactics. “I have one slot left this month.” “If you don’t book by Friday I’m raising my rates.” “You don’t want your book to wait, do you?” Real editors don’t sell like used cars. They’re booked because they’re good, not because they bullied you.
11. Sketchy contracts (or no contract at all). A real freelance editor uses a contract. Read it. If it’s missing scope, dates, or revision policy — push back. If they refuse to formalize it — walk.
12. Email domain mismatch. “I’m with NY Book Editors” but the email comes from @gmail.com or @nybookeditrs.com (typo’d). Verify the domain. Always.
When in doubt: post the editor’s name in the r/writing subreddit, the Absolute Write Water Cooler forums, or the Indies Unlimited Facebook groups. Other authors will tell you.
Should You Be a Beta Reader’s Editor or a Hired Editor?
These are different relationships, and authors mash them together at their own cost.
Beta readers are unpaid (or low-paid) readers who tell you how the book hit them. They’re not professionals. They don’t fix prose. They don’t restructure your second act. They tell you “I got bored at chapter 14,” “I didn’t trust the love interest,” “the ending was confusing.” That data is gold — but it’s reaction, not solution.
Hired editors are professionals you pay to diagnose and fix problems. They give you specifics, not just feelings. They don’t owe you friendship. The relationship is transactional, which is the whole point — they can be honest because they’re not your friend.
You need both, in this order:
- Self-edit the first draft until it embarrasses you slightly less.
- Beta readers to find what’s not landing. Free or low-cost. 5–10 readers, at least three from your target genre.
- Manuscript critique or developmental edit to fix the structural problems beta readers flagged but couldn’t solve.
- Self-revise based on the editor’s letter. Deep work. Weeks of it.
- Line edit to polish the prose.
- Copyedit to clean the mechanics.
- Proofread on the formatted file.
Skipping step 2 (beta readers) is a common money mistake. If you go straight from first draft to paid developmental editor, you’re paying $5,000 for the editor to tell you what beta readers would have told you for free. Use beta readers to surface the obvious problems. Use the editor to fix the ones beta readers can sense but can’t articulate.
Reverse error: trying to use beta readers as editors. They will not give you a structural plan. They will give you “I dunno, the middle felt slow.” That is not enough to revise a book. If you keep going back to beta readers expecting expert feedback, you’re going to spin for years.
Two roles. Two relationships. Use them both, in order.
FAQ — Book Editing
Q: How much does it cost to edit an 80,000-word book? A: At 2026 EFA medians, a full editorial suite (developmental + line + copy + proof) runs about $7,000–$9,300. A budget pipeline (manuscript critique + copyedit + proofread) lands around $1,500–$4,000. A bare-minimum pass (copyedit only) is $800–$2,400.
Q: Are editors near me better than online? A: No. Book editing is a fully remote profession. The “best book editors near me” search is mostly habit. The best editor for your genre might be in a different time zone. Search by genre fit and credentials, not zip code. That said, a local MFA grad can be a cheap and surprisingly strong developmental option if you live near a creative writing program.
Q: How do I know if an editor’s rate is fair? A: Compare it to the EFA 2026 rate chart and the Reedsy marketplace average. If they’re inside the median range and the sample is good, you’re paying fairly. If they’re below half the median, ask why — sometimes it’s a beginner, sometimes it’s AI, sometimes it’s both.
Q: Should I get the same editor for the full pipeline? A: Usually no. A great developmental editor isn’t always a great copyeditor. Hire by specialty. Some editors offer “package deals” across types — those are fine if the editor is genuinely strong in each, but verify with samples in each role.
Q: What if I can only afford one type of edit? A: Pick copyediting + proofreading bundled if you’ve done structural work yourself with beta readers. Pick a manuscript critique if you haven’t done structural work and don’t trust your beta readers to find it.
Q: How do I prepare a manuscript before sending it to an editor? A: Run it through ProWritingAid or Grammarly to catch surface errors. Format it cleanly (12pt Times New Roman, double-spaced, indents not tabs, page numbers). Write a one-page synopsis. Note your target word count, genre, intended audience. Some editors ask for all of this, some don’t, but it cuts hours off their reading time.
Q: Can I negotiate editor rates? A: Cautiously, yes — especially on long projects, repeat work, or off-season bookings (January–March is often slower). Don’t haggle hard with an editor whose work you respect. Pay them their rate. The work is worth it.
Q: Should I get a sample edit? A: Yes. Always. Even if it’s a small fee. The sample tells you everything.
Q: What’s the difference between a manuscript critique and a developmental edit? A: A manuscript critique is an editorial letter only — no margin notes, no in-line feedback. Cheaper. A developmental edit includes the letter plus margin notes throughout the manuscript identifying specific scenes and lines that aren’t working. More expensive, more actionable.
Q: Do I need an editor if I’m using AI to write the book? A: More than ever. AI-generated prose has consistent surface competence and consistent structural emptiness. A human developmental editor is the only way to spot the hollow patterns. Don’t skip.
Where To Go Next
- Not sure your manuscript is ready? Run it through the free editor and proofreader and grammar checker first.
- Self-edit before you pay anyone: 25 self-editing tips for indie authors.
- Need grammar cleanup? ProWritingAid or Grammarly — run these before a human editor to save money.
- Ready for developmental editing? BookButchers (flat-rate, genre fiction) or FixYourFiction (structural revision). Chapterra for AI-assisted developmental passes.
- Formatting after editing: Vellum (Mac) or Atticus (any device).
- Launch strategy: Bestseller Blueprint — covers the cover, category, and positioning that no editor will rescue.
The edit is not the whole game. But it’s the part where the book stops being a draft and starts being a product. Don’t skip it. Don’t overpay for it. Do it in the right order.
Sources: EFA 2026 Rate Chart, EFA Rate Survey, Reedsy editor pricing guide, Editor World rates and process, MW Editing rates breakdown, BubbleCow on dev-edit red flags, Reedsy on publishing scams, Anne R. Allen on writer scams. Last updated May 2026.
Derek Murphy has a PhD in Literature, is a USA Today and Wall Street Journal bestselling author, and has spent over a decade helping authors write, publish, and sell books through Creativindie. When he’s not critiquing manuscripts or building writing tools, he’s probably in a castle somewhere with cats.
7 Comments
“Personally, I’m against contracts. In general, trying to “protect” your writing from others is a bad idea. Nobody is going to profit from your book except you. If it’s a really good book, expect that someday it will be offered for free somewhere. Take it as a compliment (you should actually be shooting for it – it’s a benchmark of success)”
Yeah, No. The contract is used to set the terms of the editing service agreement. It establishes expectations on both sides, such as as when the author is going to deliver the completed MS and when the editor is going to finish each phase of contracted editing. It can explain expectations regarding editor “error rates.” (No single editor is likely to catch every error–yet some authors have tried to sue or extort editors with threats of lawsuits over a handful of errors in an 80K MS.) The contract sets rates and terms for canceling the business agreement.
As for rates… Have you tried to figure out how much your per-word rate ends up in terms of $ per hour? Were you paying rent, utilities and eating–or having time to–at the rate you claimed you charged? (Rhetorical questions) That sounds like a hobbyist (often retirees) or novice rate. Writers who can find a GOOD and Experienced editor at that rate are extremely lucky. Often what you find is a novice who’s halfway decent in terms of grammar and hunting down typos–maybe.
Maybe look a little deeper into the contract issue and reconsider. Since the self-publishing boom, there has been a huge increase in scammers claiming to be editors who do all sorts of misdeeds–including, taking MONTHS to edit, flaking out in the middle of the job, “disappearing” with a writer’s money, running a spell check and calling it an edit, editing an MS incorrectly, sending an MS to a friend who tosses it up on Amazon as their own (plagiarizing), and more. These sorts of editing “misadventures” are a regular topic of discussion in professional editing groups.
Anyway, peace and good writing.
Thanks for the comments – I agree there are tons of people offering to be editors on the cheap, many of whom aren’t qualified; but there are also extremely talented editors who don’t have formal qualifications. In general, editors charge as much as they can for what their time is worth; but those with nice websites or traffic can charge more – so price doesn’t always (or even usually) indicate skill level.
Authors spend a lot of money on editors, and this article was meant to help them find a qualified editor in a very murky industry. And I agree – I was only thinking of NDA agreements where authors try to overprotect their work, I hadn’t considered contracts to protect the editor, which are often necessary.
Some of this is very good advice, but – sorry – some of it is bunk. Mac users don’t (and shouldn’t) charge more just for working on Macs, nor should anyone charge more because they’re single vs. married, or even based on where they live. An editor’s rates/fees should be based on experience, skill level and chutzpah factor (having confidence to charge what we’re worth. Geography may be a factor in terms of what an editor needs to earn to pay for living expenses, but I still base my rates on my level of experience, skill and chutzpah. I’ve never had anyone ask me to reduce my rates because I don’t live in NYC or LA, and I never would accede if they did.
And putting down a colleague who has many years of experience is ageist, foolish and disrespectful. Someone with many years of experience will be more skilled than someone new to the field. Sure, we all age and confront the limitations that age may bring, but that doesn’t mean that an editor with, say, 30+ years of experience should retire and and go hide in a corner.
As for contracts or letters of agreement, they protect both author and editor and are well worth using. The only – luckily very few – times I’ve been ripped off by an editing client was when we didn’t have a formal contract. Luckily, even e-mail messages confirming details of a project can be used as contract language if a dispute arises.
Yes, you’re totally right – sorry for the things I said in the original article, they were thoughtless. It was written years ago.
Leaving behind the ageism, sexism, anti-marriage prejudice and whatever else-isms, I can only figure you are trying to get people who don’t know how to write ( or read, or think critically) to avail themselves of your sleek fleek hipster young cleavage (male or female) at high costs. To that goal I say “You go, go ahead, be the go-to editor for all the people that can’t write.” That’ll wear you out quickly to where you forget you’re under 33 years old. It would be a kind of instant karma. Plus, I guess you’ll have to keep changing this article every year to make it “under 34, under 35” and so on.
The most hilarious thing about age discrimination is that eventually, you yourself will grow old (if you’re lucky). It’s the only kind of bigotry where you automatically become your own target eventually.
oh, and the thing about macs vs pcs is so bizarre and meaningless, that you’re not doing a lot to assure anyone you have what it takes to be a professional anything, much less an editor.
and, it’s “whom to trust”. If your headline is wrong, and you want me to hire you to edit my book, you become a self-parody.
I’m not even sure where to start with some of this.
Your suggested pricing methodology for editors is rubbish. I’m not going to pay an editor more because they are married or want to drive a Ferrari. That’s their problem. What you can charge depends on what the market will bear. It also depends on perceived value. The more someone values your work, the more they will pay for it. Customer service is part of that, so grouchy is probably not helping the cause. I’m a lawyer, which means I’m often giving unpleasant feedback just like editors do, and being grouchy about it does not help my case. A flash website does not guarantee an editor is any good, but perception is reality, so all editors should aim to have a professional website to assist them in marketing themselves. All you can do is level the playing field.
The second point on value. If you run around telling people they don’t need editors, you are devaluing your own work, and thereby reducing what you can charge for it. What you just did is the editorial equivalent of authors selling books for 99c. Now maybe you really believe that, or maybe you just feel embarrassed to say writers need editors when you are an editor, but I’m NOT an editor, and I’ll say it: EVERY WRITER NEEDS AN EDITOR.
I’m sorry, but they do. Too many people publish raw first drafts without even revising themselves, much less editing, and it’s dragging the quality of literature down. Some writers don’t even know what revising and rewriting is, apparently. They write THE END and think their job is done. Now maybe a very rare book has been successful without editing (or without good editing–Twilight, 50 Shades) but they are usually exceptions that took off based on the market and the plot of the story. Unless you have that one in a million story, you should edit. And because you don’t know if you’ve got it until your book sells (or not) you should edit.
Yes, it’s expensive. Hey, newsflash. Writing professionally is a business. And like all businesses, there are expenses. Editing is one of them.
Although you’ve mentioned character development, plot revisions etc, this article also has way more emphasis on typos than it should. Finding a typo is not the editor’s main job. It is to make the story stronger by focusing on story elements and sentence construction. While you mentioned this, I don’t feel you put it up-front-and-centre like you should have. An author can find their own typos if they try hard enough (read the book backwards), but they CAN’T do the other stuff because they “can’t see the forest for the trees” or, they are quite simply too close to their own work. How can you ever assess if the reader is actually getting the right message from a chapter when you already know what that message is? By highlighting typos and putting developmental edits in the background, you have further devalued your own work by making it sound like what you do is easy and not that important anyway. Sure, readers will occasionally complain about typos, but in my experience they complain about slow stories, boring plot lines, shallow characters and inconsistencies far more often.
And finally, “I’m against contracts”. Are you for real? OK, I’ve already said I’m a lawyer, so yes, I’m vested in maintaining the value of MY services, but I can also testify from firsthand experience all the wonderful things that can go wrong if you don’t have a contract. No contract? How do you prove what you’re supposed to be paid? How does the author establish what services you were providing? Or if it was done in the agreed time? You’ll probably say–it’s in the email. Well, you know what, that’s a contract! Maybe not as formal, and not affording either party very much protection, but it’s a contract. A contract is for the mutual benefit of both parties, so what has a party got to hide if they won’t sign it? I would suggest that an editor has a standard even-handed contract that authors can sign as quick fix to this issue.
I see you did remove some of the more egregious statements from this piece, particularly the ones about editors’ ages. However, it still contains terrible advice, and ignorant statements. No editor—no one with any integrity—charges more because they work on a Mac or because they’re married. Pricing is based on skill, experience and marketplace standards.
Not only that, how do you expect writers to avoid such editors? Ask what kind of computer they use? Um, OK, sure, go ahead. Ask whether they’re married? Where they live? What their cost of living is? Now you’re getting into very weird territory. I’m no lawyer, but I have to wonder about the legality, or at least the ethics of this. Regardless, it’s unnecessary and just ludicrous.
I’m not even going to address the ridiculous contract part. Others have already done so quite well.
Finally, in your title, it should be “whom to trust.” Also, “And it’s crazy how terrible a lot of editor’s sites are.” should be “editors’ sites,” plural possessive.
Add Comment