If you've uploaded your print files to KDP or IngramSpark and gotten a rejection or warning about "bleed," you're not alone. This is one of the most common technical rejections for new authors, and it's actually easy to fix once you understand what's happening.
What bleed is: When any image, color block, or design element touches the edge of a page, the printer needs extra image area beyond the trim line to account for slight variations in where the paper gets cut. This extra area -- typically 0.125 inches (3mm) on each side -- is called bleed. Without it, the cutting machine might leave a thin white strip along the edge of your image, which looks terrible. Why this trips up so many authors: The word "bleed" sounds technical and scary, but the concept is simple. Think of it like wallpaper -- if you want the pattern to go all the way to the edge of the wall, you need to cut the paper slightly larger than the wall and trim the excess. Same principle. The printer cuts the pages slightly larger than the final trim size, and any artwork that needs to reach the edge has to extend into that extra area. The two scenarios: Scenario 1: You have images or design elements that touch the edge of the page. In this case, you need to enable bleed in your KDP/IngramSpark settings and ensure your PDF includes the extra bleed area. Your page size in the PDF should be the trim size plus 0.25 inches in width and 0.125 inches in height (to account for bleed on three sides -- left/right and bottom, but not the spine side for print books). Your images need to extend all the way to the edge of this larger PDF page. Scenario 2: No images touch the edge of the page. If your book is text-only with standard margins, you should select "no bleed" in your upload settings. Most fiction and straightforward non-fiction falls into this category. The rejection happens when authors accidentally select "bleed" when they don't need it, or when a background color or header element unintentionally extends to the page edge. How to fix it:If you're using Atticus or Vellum, the software handles bleed settings automatically based on your template choices. This is one of the major advantages of using a proper formatting tool.
If you're working in InDesign or exporting from another tool, make sure your document setup includes 0.125" bleed on all sides, and that any edge-touching elements extend into the bleed zone. Export as PDF/X-1a or PDF/X-3 for best results.
The simplest fix for most authors: if you don't have images touching the edges of your pages, select "no bleed" and make sure nothing in your interior extends past your margins. Problem solved.
The sneaky culprits:Sometimes bleed rejections come from elements you didn't realize were touching the edge. Common offenders: a header or footer line that extends too far, a decorative chapter ornament that's slightly too wide, or a background shading element in a table that extends to the margin. If you get a bleed rejection and you're not sure why, open your PDF at high zoom and scroll through every page looking for anything -- even a thin line -- that touches the trim edge.
If you're using a formatting tool like Vellum or Atticus and still getting bleed errors, the problem is usually in your import file. Check that you don't have any hidden elements from your Word or Google Docs source that are carrying over into the formatted output.
---
---
## Chapter 3 Checklist: Production & Polish
---
# Chapter 4: The Publishing Path Traditional, self, or hybrid -- choosing the model that fits your goals.
---
I need to say something that's going to irritate people on both sides of the publishing debate: traditional publishing and self-publishing are not rival religions. They're tools. You don't pledge loyalty to a hammer and refuse to use a screwdriver. You pick the tool that matches the job.
But you wouldn't know that from reading author forums. The traditional publishing crowd treats self-publishing like a consolation prize -- something you settle for when you can't get a "real" deal. The self-publishing crowd treats traditional publishing like a scam -- a dinosaur industry that takes 85% of your money and gives you nothing in return. Both camps are half-right and completely useless as career advice.
The truth: the most successful authors I know are hybrids. They self-publish the books where speed, control, and margin matter. They chase traditional deals for the books where bookstore distribution, prestige, and institutional reach matter. They think about each book individually and ask one question: what's the best path for this project?
That's the question I want you to ask, too. Not "which tribe do I belong to?" but "what do I actually want from this specific book?"
If you want to be on the front table at Barnes & Noble, in airport bookshops, and reviewed in the New York Times, you probably need a traditional deal -- and you need to understand what that requires. If you want to publish on your timeline, keep 70% of every sale, and build a business you fully control, self-publishing is the superior model for most authors. And if you want to do both at different times for different projects, that's not only possible -- it's increasingly common.
This chapter helps you make that decision with clear eyes and real numbers. No ideology. No tribalism. Just strategy.
---
Get the full 117-question publishing FAQ, plus our 7-step framework + free templates.
Browse all 117 questions →