Best AI writer: advanced AI content writing generators for your story, book, blog or business

In 1953, Roald Dahl wrote a short story about an AI Writing tool called The Great Automatic Grammatizator. It used to be the stuff of impossible fiction, but in AI writing tools are here for real, and they’re probably already better than you expect.

Dahl’s story is dystopian, and ends with creative writers signing away their names and styles, so that they can retire and have robots do all the writing for them. It ends with the forced choice, to either sign away their creativity or let their family go hungry:

The time the screw turns tighter for those who hesitate to sign their names. This very moment, as I sit here listening to the howling of my nine starving children in the other room, I can feel my own hand creeping closer and closer to that golden contract that lies over on the other side of the desk. Give us strength, Oh Lord, to let our children starve.

It’s a stark and dire warning against this kind of technology, and many people are raising warnings and ethical concerns about new AI writing tools like chatGPT3.

But not because the writing is bad. Because it’s too good.

In all the controversy, however, one thing that is only starting to become recognized is how powerful AI writing tools can be for proofreading and editing. The argument for or against editing usually goes like this: new authors ask whether they need it. Some people say “absolutely: do not publish until you’ve hired an editor!” and other people say “it’s a scam: get beta readers.”

It kind of depends on whether you’re pitching trad publishers and literary agents, or planning to self-publish. Of course it should be as clean as possible and as good as possible. In the past, I’ve made the argument that book cover design matters more than editing; because they have to start reading it before the typos matter.

And also that proofreading isn’t really necessary because you can use Grammarly to find typos and grammar mistakes. But it takes a long time, even when using something like Grammarly or spellcheck, and it’s hard to proof your own work. So it’s fine to outsource, but expensive – even basic line editing or proofreading for a book may cost $500~$1000 (money better spent on covers); and fixing the small stuff will make your book clean but not good.

What you really need is a developmental editor from a professional who can point out all the critical story structure problems or weak writing and help you significantly improve the dramatic narrative: but that will cost thousands of dollars. As an editor, I’m really good at this stuff, but I hate doing it. It’s a huge *waste* of time and skills to fix thousands of grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes that anybody could have found; and even if I’m just doing a passive developmental edit or manuscript critique, it takes me a long time to read the whole book carefully and I charge a lot: and most authors make common, predictable mistakes that they could learn to avoid by going through my (mostly free) writing resources.

BUT: it takes a ton of time and experience to learn everything, and I get that for most authors, it’s faster and easier to pay for help rather than learn how to self-edit. Most authors get help to make their story clean, but it still won’t necessarily be successful, which is the hidden tragedy of all self-published books – that they are made for personal expression and not deliberately as a product to be enjoyed, and that most authors lose money they’ll never earn back (although, those that stick with it, will gradually learn to do better and it IS possible to be successful and make a living.

So I’ve spent the last year experimenting with AI writing tools to see whether or not they might help authors write books… and the good news is they absolutely can!

Down below I’ve listed some of the more interesting ones, but here’s a quick summary of my favorites:

• Sudowrite for fiction (and nonfiction)
• Jasper (used in the following examples)
• GhosttheWriter or Quillbot for paraphrasing or rewriting

Sudowrite is the best, but if you just need proofreading or light editing, chatGPT does a pretty great job. I’ve been building my own tool, GhosttheWriter, which is experimental but also pretty powerful.

Best AI writers, software and online tools

Ps this is rough, work in progress that’s not quite done yet….

check out my other post on best writing apps & software.

Hey there fellow writers! Are you tired of staring at your blank screen, unsure of where to begin? Do you find yourself stuck in a creative rut, unable to come up with fresh ideas for your writing? As someone who’s spent countless hours honing their craft, I know just how frustrating it can be to get stuck on a plot point or find yourself staring at a blank page. The answer to a lot of those stuck moments may lie in AI writing tools and software.

That’s right, you heard me correctly. With the help of these advanced programs, you can take your writing to the next level and beyond. From generating ideas and outlines to editing and revising your work, these tools are here to make your life as a writer easier and more productive. They can even help you improve your writing skills by providing personalized feedback and suggestions. And let me tell you, once you start using them, you’ll wonder how you ever managed without them.

But why are they so important, you ask? Well, let me tell you. Writing can be a lonely and challenging process, and it’s easy to get bogged down in the details. With AI writing tools, you can take the pressure off yourself and let the software do the heavy lifting. Not only can these tools help you generate new ideas, but they can also help you organize your thoughts and streamline your writing process.

One of the greatest benefits of using AI writing tools is their ability to help you edit and revise your work. We all know that editing can be a tedious and time-consuming process, but with the help of software like Grammarly or ProWritingAid, you can catch grammar and spelling errors with ease. These tools can also help you improve your writing by suggesting alternative words and phrasing to enhance your prose.

And let’s not forget about the power of AI in generating content. Need a character name or a plot twist? Look no further than AI writing tools like Plot Generator or Character Name Generator. These tools can help you get unstuck and give you the inspiration you need to keep writing.

Now, I know some of you might be skeptical about using AI for something as personal and creative as writing. But trust me, these tools aren’t here to replace you or your unique voice. Instead, they’re here to support and enhance your writing, making it even better than before.

In short, AI writing tools and software are the future of writing. They can help you generate ideas, organize your thoughts, improve your writing, and save you time and effort in the process. So, if you’re ready to take your writing to the next level, I highly recommend checking out some of the best AI writing tools and software available today. Why not give them a try? Your writing (and sanity) will thank you.

AI editing and writing tools

So with all that out of the way, here’s what I’m excited about: it’s possible to use chatGPT3 or GPT3(davinci) to edit your manuscript, and it does a pretty good job. I could put in the text chapter by chapter and the tools will fix all the typos, grammar and punctuation. It may make some mistakes, it may miss some things, but it’ll catch a LOT of the banal, minor punctuation issues that I would have to manually fix a thousand times until I hate my life… and then I can focus on real issues that actually employ and require my expertise.

Proofreading AI tools

These are only starting to become available and it’s early days, but within a year I think they’ll be a lot better. The main advantage is, rather than having Grammarly mark potential issues and needing to click to approve each change, an AI tool will just fix everything and give you some options.

Rewrite or Paraphrase AI tools

These are a little more robust, and not always suited for fiction, but they work miracles for something that has been translated or was written by a non-native speaker. They basically offer other ways of structuring sentences that sound smoother and flow better. If you write fiction, that’s probably overkill, and you don’t want a machine rewriting everything. But for nonfiction it works pretty well (and for fiction it CAN work well, with more precise prompts and instructions.)

You can also take your chapter and just *improve* it: make it longer, add more detailed description, add more drama and conflict and suspense. Write in the style of a bestselling (genre) book. You can’t be precious with the output so this is more of an an early days, rough draft rather than a final polish.

Developmental editing tools

This is the most interesting one: you can add in a chapter and prompt AI to give you a critical literary review of the chapter, focusing on the style, writing, descriptions, everything. It *works* right now but isn’t perfect. In a year I think it will be.

AI Writing Generation

People are really having fun with having AI tools generate long-form articles and short stories based on a simple writing prompt, because it can do just about anything and is really very decent. But right now it’s more of a gimmick. However, for drafting a book (or pumping out 100 SEO articles that are probably already better than what you’re paying writers for and cost so much less) these tools are becoming very popular… but mostly in the tech industries.

Artists and writers, are very often unenthused or even actively hostile to AI generative tools on principle. And that’s fine; but most authors also struggle with writing and editing books, because it’s hard.

So I made this list to feature some of my favorite writing softwares, and some new AI writing tools that I think could be very useful, either right now or in the near future.

I’m still updating and adding to this list, so it’s meant as just a quick introduction and you can continue doing your own research to see which tool you need.

GPT-4 / ChatGPT

Almost all new AI tools are built on GPT3. “ChatGPT” is a version of GPT3, but not exactly the same. You an access GPT3 directly in OpenAI’s playground, and it’s ridiculously cheap (about 2 cents/1000 words). The problem is, it’s not super user-friendly.

ChatGPT is a cleaner interface, and it’s responsive: so you can keep asking questions and it will remember the history. This is what I was playing with, on this post and video. Because, in theory, you could put in a chapter and it could continue the next chapter. It’s not quite there yet, but it is super impressive, which is why it got a million users its first week. It was free at first, but they’ve just started adding pricing plans and offering them to some users, but I’m not sure if it’ll stay this price or whether you can upgrade.

Update: the previous versions were GPT3.5.
GPT4 just launched, if you’re paying for the chatGPT pro ($20 a month) you’ll have access to GPT4. It’s kind of amazing. Right now it’s the best thing, because other tools can’t build on its API yet, but that will change soon.

Jasper – AI for business

Jasper (formerly Jarvis) is one of the first AI writing tools I used. It’s meant for copy writing and sales, using psychological sales formula and persuasion. It works well for long blog posts but is pretty great for sales pages or sales copy: which means you can use it for blurbs to boost book sales. It works great, and as first-mover is probably one of the most powerful options.

$49/m for 50,000 words

Get Jasper here

Wepik’s AI Writer

Wepik’s AI Writer is more than just a tool; it’s like having an expert writer by your side. Whether you’re penning a blog, a book, or business stuff, this AI doesn’t just help with ideas—it’s fantastic at editing and fixing mistakes too. It spots typos, grammar slips, and even suggests ways to make your sentences sound better. And it’s not just for factual stuff—it can help with stories too, given the right prompts. Sure, there are debates about using AI for writing, but when paired with human touch, tools like Wepik’s AI Writer can be a writer’s best friend.

Get WePik AI here

GhostTheWriter

This is something I’ve been working on, mostly for educational/entertainment purposes. You can type what you want it to write, and (optional) choose a writing style by “summoning” the ghost of a famous writer. I’ve been building in some really advanced editing and rewriting tools.

It was meant to be a fun novelty project, but actually it’s got some insane features, everything I wanted, using variations of chatgpt3 prompts. You can already rewrite your content in certain styles. But it will soon have: edit this, give me constructive critical feedback, rewrite in active tense (show don’t tell), rewrite in present/past or first person POV / third person POV.

It’s especially great for fiction, because I did a lot of research and have very long and detailed prompts. It’ll also have “keep writing this” so you could put in one scene and it would write the next. It’s still in the works, but it’s fun to play with and some of the features are going to be pretty amazing.

Get GhostTheWriter AI

Sudowrite – AI for fiction

Currently, Sudowrite is the leading recommendation among fiction writers. It does a lot of things well, and I was impressed enough with it that I’ll probably use it a lot. With some practice, you can get it to geenrate a scene and keep it going; but you can go back and rewrite with different settings, for a scene that needs more action or romance or mystery. It has a built in name/place/everything generator, and I haven’t tested the limits yet but they seem to be long enough that *maybe* I could continue a long-form story or novel and it would keep track of everything that happened earlier (this is the “holy grail” of AI writing – writing full novels and keeping track of personalities, characters, plot events, world-building background and history, etc… we aren’t there yet but I’ll bet some of these AI writing tools will be capable by the end of 2023 or soon after).

$20/m for 90,000 words.

Try SudoWrite here

Squibler AI

Squibler is “devoted to helping storytellers write and create more stories.” They have a wide range of tools, specifically for books, screenplays and novels, plus some useful AI features and a slick interface. I haven’t tested the output yet against something like SudoWrite but they are definitely focusing on the kind of things I would need as a writer.

Try Squibler here

ClaudeAI

I never really got a handle on Claude, but authors swear by it – it’s great for feedback and has a 100K model. It’s mostly good for brainstorming, developing ideas, or improving your writing. People love it because it’s so supportive and friendly.

Get ClaudeAI

NovelAI

I’m in some writing groups and apparently NovelAI got a new upgrade that makes it as good as SudoWrite or Claude… you be the judge.

Get NovelAI

ShakespeareAI

Also for marketing copy, sales pages and things like that: “Artificial intelligence makes it fast & easy to create content for your blog, social media, website, and more! “

Get ShakespeareAI

Canva Magic Write

Canva is an online graphic design tool, so I was surprised to see they’d added an AI writing tool called “Magic Write.” I tested it a little, and I like the smooth interface (it’s like google docs, but with AI). I asked it to brainstorm an outline for an article on how to write a book, and then filled in some gaps.

I even used an AI detection tool and it said it was mostly written by a human, which is great – because it definitely wasn’t. (Those tools have about a 50% hit or miss rate, but it’s still a good idea to test out tools to see what their default AI written content looks like. Technically, they’re all using GPT3 probably, but different internal prompts and settings can make a huge difference.

I think this is included with Canva pro, so you might have access to it already, and if you don’t it’s a cheaper option, but still great to play around with. They have some nice features, like brainstorm, continue writing, long-form articles, and (soon) summarize and paraphrase.

$12.99/m … unlimited?

Get Magic Write here.

Quillbot Paraphrase

I’ve also been using this one a fair bit. It’s a rephraser/rewriting tool and it’s hugely popular right now, with 700K search traffic. You can paste in your writing and it’ll rewrite it for you in different styles. Super useful for nonnative speakers or some nonfiction, but not great for fiction or literary stuff. I’ve used it to clean up translations, and sometimes it does blurbs well.

Get Quillbot here or see my full review.

PS I have my own rephraser tool for fiction, that’s a bit bettter.

Grammarly & ProwritingAid

Grammarly and ProwritingAid are two of the older tools that help check writing and find typos. I did a deep comparison a few years ago (here) and found that Grammarly finds more actual typos. Prowritingaid is useful to go a bit deeper on writing style, but still pretty basic. I don’t love that you have to go through and click each instance a thousand times and fix everything manually. But my guess is, both tools will adapt quickly and upgrade with more AI features to stay competitive.

• Grammarly (AI coming soon)
• Prowritingaid (already added AI)

It’s astonishing that people will pay me thousands of dollars for a basic edit and proofread, when they could find all the typos, punctuation and grammar mistakes themselves with grammarly… but, also, it takes dozens of hours of work and is a pain (tedious, boring) so I understand why it’s easier to outsource. Plus, grammarly will flag lots of things that aren’t actually issues (it doesn’t like how I use commas)… but I ignore all that and look for actual typos. You really only need the “correctness” feature, which I think might be free.

Also, they both have Word plugins, which is useful.

Microsoft Word

I wasn’t going to include this one, but even though it’s ancient and buggy, it’s still primarily what I use to write books and novels. And since Microsoft is investing in chatgpt3 there’s a lot of rumors that it will start including AI tools into its existing “Office” writing software.

DeepL – Write

Here’s something I am excited about; I believe you can just upload you text and it will fix all the issues for you. Just the issues (typos, punctuation, etc). To be honest it’s nothing groundbreaking, you can already do this with any GPT3 tool with the right prompts. Use something like “act as a professional editor and proofreader: fix any typos, spelling issues, grammar issues or punctuation problems. Edit this and remove problems.”

But anyway, it’s a simple interface and I love the idea of uploading content and just having it fix everything immediately. The only thing is, it probably isn’t flawless, so you may need to proofread it all again yourself or use grammarly to hunt for typos. Still worth it, if it fixes 300 punctuation or formatting issues you’d need to fix yourself manually.

DeepL is also really good at translations.

Try DeepL

Dabble

I haven’t had a chance to play around with Dabble yet but it comes highly recommended by and author friend. I believe it’s kind of like Scrivener, in that you can write and organize all your ideas. I don’t think it has actual AI features yet but if you’re looking for a place to organize your book, keep track of writing goals and word count, etc, it could be useful.

$10~$20/m

Check out Dabble

Cold Turkey Writer

Cold Turkey Writer is basically a productivity app; it makes a distraction free workspace and won’t let you exit until you hit your worcount goals.

Check it out

Most Dangerous Writing App

Something similar is Squibler’s “most dangerous writing app” which forces you to write and has a minimal workspace and countdown timer so you’re pressured to do the work. I like the design and it’s useful, but just to write the words during a quick sprint; you’ll still need to move them to wherever you do your whole manuscript compiling.

Check it out

Write every day

If you want to establish a writing habit, this one works pretty well – it offers merit badge awards to keep

you motivated and productive.

Check it out

GoogleDocs (AI plugins)

Lots of people like to write in Google docs because they can access it from any device and it’s always saved and updated. There are already some AI plugins I’ll review soon; but I wouldn’t be surprised if Google docs responds to Canva and Microsoft with their own AI writing tools and features.

The best AI writing software (2023)

The best writing software of 2023, in my opinion, is one I’m not allowed to share yet. It’s based off my 24 chapter plot outlines, but helps keep everything together like Scrivener. And there’s an AI feature, to generate images for your characters and scenes; keep track of your daily writing habits and word count goals, use a “brainstorm” feature to research anything without getting lost down a google rabbit hole, and a lot of other things. It’s pretty great, and when it’s ready I’ll add a link here. But sign up to my email list if you want first/early access and probably a discount.

Coming soon, haven’t had time to research yet!

Here are some more writing tools I haven’t had a chance to play with yet; I’ll write a quick review soon as I go test them out…

• HyperWriteAI
• Writerly.ai
• Chapterly
• Bribooks
• CELX script writing
• Final Draft

Essays:

SciSpace Copilot

WordPress AI writing app plugins…

What I really need, is a way to bulk-generate hundreds of wordpress posts and auto-schedule them, to build up new blogs quickly and keep them active with new content. So none of these tools are great for that. For really high-quality posts, I’d just use chatgpt3 (however, it’s older and not connected to the internet. Bing’s new version seems like it is connected to the internet, which is more useful for news, events or recent product reviews, and it looks great).

BUT here’s the thing, right now I’m using AI to write blog posts, to build up content and try to rank in Google so I get traffic that might earn some money. The problem with all that is, search is changing in a big way. Bing and chatgpt3 can just answer questions. Soon every app and program will have some easy version of this feature. So who is going to google or search for stuff and try to find answers when these new tools are easier, more useful, faster? Nobody.

Maybe blogging really is dead this time, it’s hard to say for sure. But I still want to build blogs that get some authority, to backlink to my main stuff that *won’t* get replaced easily or quickly, like unique templates I can make and people can use. So this is basically a very long casestudy/experiment to see if it works at all, but I won’t be bothered if it doesn’t.
I’m going to write about 1000 AI generated blog posts and put them up quickly, start linkbuilding between them, and see what happens. I’ll spend more time on the big, long, major posts and less time on all the dumb simple posts. All the content will be unique, none of it will be particularly fabulous.

What is the best AI creative writing software?

Right now the best is chatGpt4 – but soon a lot of programs will have that built in, so it depends on the use case. The best AI writing tools will have a built in process that steers you towards the right results, so it’s not all prompt engineering and experimentation. It’s going to get way too easy to plug in a few factors on a form and get brilliant content delivered instantly – that’s *better* than a thousand-dollar content or sales copywriter.

Are AI writers any good?

Yes. With Gpt4, they’re uncanny. You can adopt any authors writing style. You can instantly rephrase your own writing to make it much better. Humans will not be able to tell the difference. Click here for writing examples of GPT4.

Objection! AI writing is crap…

So real quick, most “real” writers are hating on AI or saying it will never be as good as real writers. Often they say things like it has no soul or creativity, or it can only write crappy popular books. So, keep in mind, most authors are writing creative, passion-fueled books that actually have no plot or pacing, with purple prose and flourishes and fancy words. Most writers are writing creative books that won’t sell because they aren’t enjoyable to read. I teach authors how to write popular, commercial books – because there are rules and you can learn them.

Also, the writing is crap, unless you give it a very specific, very long and detailed prompt to make it not crap. Then it’s actually pretty impressive… and in a year it will be terrifying. But it won’t really “replace” all the artists who are writing for themselves or their own enjoyment. It will be a threat to commercial authors, who are already writing quickly, writing to market, and making money – but those writers are already seeing the potential of AI.

Is AI writing plagiarism?

A lot of people are accusing chatGPT3 and other AI tools as “theft” – and I get the impulse. This is all crazy stuff. But currently, styles can’t be copyrighted, so it’s only (legal) plagiarism if you use the exact same copyrighted content and actually hurt the copyright holder’s income, and they can prove that.

It’s true, AI writing software trained off all the stuff on the internet, even without permission; for artists, this has been a call to arms because they didn’t give permission for their art to be used in AI text to image generators. CNET was accused of using AI to write articles for months, and is now accused of plagiarism: but there’s ethical/moral plagiarism that might get you in trouble in university (“cheating”) and actual criminal plagiarism or copyright infringement.

Currently, neither these tools (nor the manner in which they were developed) is illegal, and it probably won’t be (since all big companies are on board already, with both text to image, and AI writing generators.) Amazon just added this checkbox, which shows they are adapting, not refusing to embrace AI tools.

There’s a lot to be said about how these AI tools will destroy humanity and creativity, and it’s a big discussion. I’ve said a lot on this already, so I won’t repeat everything here. But basically:

• Is it legal? YES
• Could that change in the future? Maybe, but doubtful.
• Can you use it without getting in trouble? YES
• Is it “ethical” to use AI tools for your writing?

That last question doesn’t really have an answer. Most people will say, using AI tools at all is revulting, and only a talentless hack would use them. But writing books is hard; most people already hire book coaches, or editors at least, and often someone to write their blurbs, or even a heavy developmental editor, or ghostwriter/cowriter.

There are lots of ways to write books, and rarely is one person excellent at every different skillset. But outsourcing is expensive and doing it all yourself is brutal torture. For the first time, AI tools are going to make it easy to quickly sketch out plotting outlines, quick rough draft scenes and chapters, improve and polish the writing, and even proofread and edit it (I constantly see readers complain about indie books and typos or grammar mistakes; but that’s because editing is so expensive and even an editor probably won’t catch everything.

Many people, myself included, see these tools as useful programs that will allow us to do what we’re already doing, but with much less sweat and work. If you’ve been following this platform (creativindie) you’ll know it’s all about how to make more great creative work without suffering or sacrificing for your art. So while I’m hesitant and careful, for both legal and moral reasons, I’m also trying to stay hyper-aware of developments in AI writing tools, because very soon they will be a normal part of life.

What does this mean for book editors?

Obviously, it’s a problem. If it’s easy and super cheap to get critical feedback, or skip all that and just rewrite and revise your writing to make it clean and better, that’ll save you thousands of dollars (not to mention years of struggle, procrastination, fear and doubt, so you can finish better books faster).

But it will put editors out of work: especially those who only offer proofreading or line-edits. Most authors don’t want an editor to rewrite their story anyway, they just want it clean and fixed, with some broad tips on how to improve it (which I’ve always had frustrations about: because most books are not well constructed and need significant, major rewrites, and as an editor there’s only so much I can do).

For my part, I’ll probably close down my book editing services completely and just recommend AI tools instead; or focus on high-level critique or revisions. Proofreading is not high-skill intensive, and it can be outsource or replaced by authors seeking cheaper options.

Editors are going to have to get better at the high level stuff, understanding what makes excellent book writing, flagging weaknesses, pointing out consistency issues, all the real things that only a human can do (for now) and in my opinion, a lot of editors – even if they have the skills – are not working hard enough to make sure they do a good job (machines are better than humans in terms of attention and work ethic).

There are some things only humans can do, and there are some editors that will continue to be valuable. I imagine editors will start saying things like “AI has no soul and can never replace us!” but it obviously can, just like it will replace book cover artists, book narrators, and many other things.

Yes including writers! Most writers will be *replaced* in that AI can write well enough to be better than most inexperienced, human writer’s messy first drafts. Writers who say AI has no soul or they won’t enjoy AI written books often believe that passion and creativity create better books: they’re often the ones who don’t sell books because they treat it as art (self-expression) rather than entertainment (user experience).

This article “AI is the end of writing” is pessimistic but fair: most commercial (successful/beloved) books that sell and are enjoyed, are written to formula and can absolutely be recreated and churned out with enough skill and experience.

I’ve been told (recently) I’m a soulless demon for talking about AI at all; and there’s always an assumption that I’m “pro-AI”. But I’m not – I absolutely agree that AI is potentially the death of creativity and human inspiration; I get why it’s terrifying and demoralizing.

But I’ve always focused on supporting authors on a budget, to write and publish the best books they can without wasting way too much money on unnecessary expenses. In most cases, AI is not a replacement at all; it’s just a cheap alternative. Maybe it’ll never be as good (though really, it’s often better). But it is cheaper. It allows people to do more with less money, time or experience. It lets creative people make more progress at a higher quality output than they can currently.

Some people may choose a boutique, fully human service and be happy to pay for it, but not everyone can afford that luxury: previously they were SOL (shit out of luck) and had no way to compete at all. These tools level the playing field. All people are creative. All people have desires and goals.

Some can afford to outsource the tricky (or boring) stuff, saving hundreds of hours of effort. Other people can’t. In my opinion, it’s never really been about the “war on art” – it’s a culture clash between people who will take the better deal at the price they can afford, rather than simply being extinguished by competition and rising service costs.

Best writing Apps and software

I’ve had trouble with this list because things are progressing SO quickly and AI is now everywhere. This is a list of some writing apps and software I use and recommend, there are a few I didn’t feature here but they’re super useful so check them out! (PS I keep it updated with AI writing tools as well.)

What AI Writing Tools Actually Do (Honest Breakdown)

Most AI writing reviews online are affiliate-link laundering pretending to be journalism. So let me be direct: there are four kinds of AI writing tools in 2026, and most writers only need one or two of them.

General-purpose LLMs (the foundations). ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok are the underlying models powering most of the tools below. You can use them directly as writing assistants — Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus both run around $20/month — and you get massive context windows, strong reasoning, and no rate limits during normal use. The downside is no fiction-specific interface. You’re working in a chat window, copy-pasting chapters in and out. For brainstorming and revision, this is fine. For sustained drafting, it gets clunky fast.

Fiction-specific tools (the specialists). Sudowrite, NovelCrafter, Plot Factory, and Squibler AI are built specifically for novelists. They wrap the same underlying LLMs in a writing-focused interface — scene cards, character codex, outline-to-draft pipelines, “expand this passage” buttons. Sudowrite’s edge in 2026 is its Muse 1.5 model, fine-tuned on published novels and (in their internal blind tests) preferred 2x over Claude 3.7 Sonnet for fiction prose. NovelCrafter’s edge is the codex system that keeps your worldbuilding consistent over a long book.

Academic and marketing copy tools. Jasper, Copy.ai, and Writesonic are not for novelists. They’re for marketers writing blurbs, ads, Amazon descriptions, SEO articles, and LinkedIn posts. If you need to write your book description, Jasper is genuinely useful. If you’re trying to draft a scene, you’re paying $39/month for the wrong tool.

Lightweight and free. The free tier of ChatGPT is more capable than most paid tools were two years ago. Claude’s free tier is excellent for revision passes. Hemingway AI helps clean up overwritten prose. NovelAI’s free tier is light but lets you experiment. And Creativindie’s own free tools at /apps/aiwriter and /apps/humanizer handle drafting and AI-tell removal without a subscription.

If you’re a beginner, start with the free tier of ChatGPT or Claude. Then upgrade only when the limits actually start blocking you, not because a YouTube affiliate told you to.

Best AI Writing Tools for Fiction (2026 Comparison)

I’ve spent real money on each of these for at least three months. Ratings reflect output quality on actual fiction projects, not press-release demos.

Key context for 2026: Sudowrite’s Muse 1.5 launched in mid-2025 and genuinely shifted the floor for fiction-specific output. NovelCrafter restructured pricing around bring-your-own-API-key (typically through OpenRouter), which makes it cheaper but adds a setup step most casual users find annoying.

If I could only pick one paid tool, I’d take Claude Pro and use the saved Sudowrite money on coffee.

General-Purpose LLMs vs Specialized Fiction AI

The dirty secret of the AI writing market is that “just use Claude” beats most specialized tools for most writers most of the time.

Claude understands narrative structure, character motivation, theme, and pacing at a level that fiction-specific wrappers don’t always match. You can paste your entire 80K-word manuscript into a single conversation and ask substantive questions about it. You can demand a rewrite of chapter 7 in the voice of chapters 1-6. You can workshop a scene the way you would with a smart writer friend who’s read everything and never gets tired.

So when do specialized tools earn their subscription?

Use Sudowrite when you write fast, you draft by feel, and you want a button that says “continue this scene in my voice.” Muse 1.5 is genuinely good at this. The friction of pasting passages in and out of Claude breaks your flow; Sudowrite keeps you inside the work.

Use NovelCrafter when you outline heavily, you write a series, and you need a codex system that actually enforces consistency. If your fantasy novel has 12 named magic systems and 40 characters across three POV arcs, you’ll lose your mind trying to keep that straight in a Claude chat window. NovelCrafter’s codex prevents that drift.

Use a general LLM when you’re outlining, brainstorming, doing structural analysis, revising existing prose, or having a conversation about your book. Which is most of the actual work, by the way.

A prompt that works in Claude:

“I’ll paste a chapter below. First, list the three weakest paragraphs and why. Don’t rewrite — just identify. Use my voice as a baseline and tell me where it slips into generic-AI-tone. Be brutal.”

A prompt that works in Sudowrite:

Open a scene card, set tone to “tense, restrained, dialogue-heavy,” select the last 600 words you wrote, hit “Write.” Then “Expand” the new paragraph to deepen pacing. Then rewrite in your own voice, keeping maybe 30% of the structure.

Different tools, different problems. Don’t pay for both unless both are solving real problems.

AI for Different Writing Tasks

This is the part most writing-AI articles get wrong. They list features and ratings without saying what AI is actually useful for, task by task. Here’s my honest scorecard after years of testing.

First drafts — mediocre at best (5/10). AI drafts are competent and lifeless. They sound like every other AI draft. The sentences are technically correct, the dialogue is plausible, and nothing in it will surprise a reader. If you want to use AI to overcome a blank page, fine, but treat the output as a structural skeleton, not finished prose.

Beat-by-beat outlining — decent (7/10). This is where AI starts to earn its keep. Hand it a premise and ask for a 24-beat outline. You’ll get something usable. Not brilliant, but workable as a starting point — and faster than staring at a blank document for two hours.

Character voice consistency — good in short bursts (7/10). Within a single scene, AI can hold a character voice if you give it enough context. Across a full novel, voice consistency degrades as the context window fills with other characters. Specialized tools with codex systems (NovelCrafter) handle this better than chat-window LLMs.

Description and worldbuilding — very good (8/10). This is AI’s quiet superpower. Need a market scene in a desert city? A thunderstorm over a fishing village? A magical academy’s library? AI generates rich, sensory detail faster than you can think it through. The trick is to use it as research material: paragraphs to mine for one or two good images, rather than dropping the whole block into your manuscript.

Dialogue — variable (6/10). ChatGPT writes natural, varied dialogue but defaults to a slightly chatty register that reads young. Claude is more restrained but tends toward overly articulate exchanges. Sudowrite’s Muse 1.5 handles dialogue best of the dedicated tools. None of them are as good as a real writer working hard on a single scene.

Revision and editing — excellent (9/10). This is where AI shines and where most writers under-use it. AI is dramatically better at criticizing prose than generating it. Hand it your draft and ask for the three weakest paragraphs, the slowest scene, the line that’s trying too hard. You’ll get sharper feedback than most paid editors, faster, and free.

What it’s bad at:

• Long-form coherence (80K words of consistent logic and tone)
• Original voice (you have to bring that yourself)
• Real emotional resonance (it imitates, but doesn’t feel)
• Plot twists that surprise (it follows patterns, so its twists are predictable)
• Knowing when to stop (it’ll generate 10,000 words of mediocre filler if you let it)

The pattern is clear. AI is a draft accelerator and a revision partner. It is not a writer.

The Hard Truth About AI Fiction (My Honest Take)

Here’s the part nobody selling an AI tool will tell you: most AI-written novels suck because the authors keep too much raw output.

I’ve read maybe a hundred AI-assisted indie novels in the last two years. The tells are always the same. Every paragraph starts with “As.” Em-dashes everywhere — like the author is having a stroke. Three-item lists in every other sentence: bigger, brighter, bolder. Characters who keep “navigating challenges” and “reflecting on their journey.” Bland metaphors that compare emotions to seasons. A fake-balanced tone where the prose hedges every observation into safety.

That’s not AI’s fault. That’s the author’s fault for not editing.

The skill that actually matters in 2026 is not “prompting AI to write your book.” It’s editing AI output ruthlessly until only your voice remains. That sometimes means cutting 80% of what AI generates and rebuilding the scene from your own sentences. It always means rewriting at least every third sentence. It usually means killing entire paragraphs that read smoothly but say nothing.

If you can’t tell when AI prose is generic, you’ll publish generic prose. The signal-to-noise filter has to live in your head, not in the tool.

The good news is this is teachable. Read your scene out loud. Anywhere you sound like every other AI writer on Amazon, change it. Anywhere you sound like yourself — odd phrasing, unexpected images, weird specific details — keep it. Rinse and repeat until the chapter is yours.

I’ve watched a lot of writers panic about AI replacing them. The writers who’ll actually get replaced are the ones who outsource their voice to a model. The ones who use AI as a power tool while keeping their fingerprints on every page will work faster, publish more, and keep readers.

That’s the whole game.

How to Use AI Without Losing Your Voice

Here’s the actual workflow I use after burning through six months of Sudowrite, eight months of Claude, and several thousand dollars of API credits.

Use AI for outlines, not prose. Hand it the premise, the genre, the tone, and your target length. Ask for a 24-beat outline with one-paragraph descriptions per beat. You’ll edit half of it, keep half of it, and save twenty hours.

Use it for “show me 5 versions of this scene, pick best beats.” Generate variations. Read them all. Steal the one good moment from each and rebuild. This is structural copying, not prose copying. The final scene is yours, with better bones.

Use it for editing passes. Paste a chapter into Claude. Ask: Where is the pacing slowest? Which character has the weakest voice? What’s the worst sentence in this chapter? You will get sharper notes than from a $300 editor, in 30 seconds.

Always rewrite generated prose in your voice. This is non-negotiable. The default register of AI prose is competent middle-distance literary fiction. If your voice is dry, sharp, and weird, that default will flatten you. Read the AI output, find the one or two good ideas inside it, and rewrite from scratch.

Set clear voice rules in your prompts. Instead of “write a scene where Sarah confronts her father,” try “write a scene where Sarah confronts her father. Voice rules: no em-dashes, no three-item lists, no opening paragraph with ‘As.’ Sentences alternate short and long. One physical detail per paragraph, no more. End on a specific small object, not an abstract emotion.” You’ll get noticeably better output.

Keep a banned-word list. Mine includes: dig, mix, detailed, proof, key, compelling, specific, multi-layered, complete guide, sharpen, serious. Run a search-and-destroy pass after every AI draft. If you want to automate it, /apps/aichecker flags this stuff for you.

The pattern: use AI for thinking, use AI for editing, write the actual prose yourself. That’s the only way to keep your voice intact.

Free vs Paid AI Writing Tools

When is free enough? When you’re drafting, brainstorming, learning, or working on shorter projects under 20,000 words. The free tiers of ChatGPT and Claude in 2026 are seriously capable. Five years ago you’d have paid hundreds for what’s now free.

When does paid pay off? Three signals:

1. You hit rate limits during real writing sessions. If you’re stopping mid-chapter because the free tier locked you out, $20/month buys back your flow.
2. You need long context. Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus handle much longer documents than free tiers. If you’re pasting 30K-word manuscripts in for analysis, free won’t cut it.
3. You need fiction-specific features. Sudowrite’s Muse model, NovelCrafter’s codex, and similar fiction-tuned features only exist in paid tools.

For most working writers, the right paid stack in 2026 is one general LLM (Claude Pro or ChatGPT Plus, $20) and at most one fiction-specific tool ($10-29). That’s $30-49/month for a setup that genuinely changes how fast you can work.

What I’d skip on a budget: Jasper ($39+/month, marketing-tuned), Writesonic, ProWritingAid Premium if you already have Claude (Claude does line edits at least as well). Free tools to bookmark: /apps/aiwriter for drafting, /apps/humanizer for stripping AI tells, /apps/aichecker for spotting slop in your own drafts.

AI Writing Ethics & Disclosure

The ethics conversation has gotten weird. People moralize about AI use as if every other writer in history wasn’t using a thesaurus, a writing group, an editor, an agent, and a publisher to make their book better. AI is another tool. The honest framework in 2026:

Traditional publishing — full disclosure required. Most agents and publishers now ask. Lying about AI use is a contract violation. If you used AI for substantive drafting, disclose it. If you used it only for grammar passes (the Grammarly tier), disclosure is usually optional, but check the contract.

Self-publishing — disclosure is optional but smart. Amazon KDP requires you to mark AI-generated content during the publishing flow. The categories are clear: AI-Generated (substantial AI-written portions), AI-Assisted (you wrote it, AI edited it), or fully human. Most writers in the assisted category are honest about it. Readers don’t usually punish honest disclosure; they punish discovering you lied.

Contests, magazines, and submissions — read the rules. Most literary magazines now ban AI-generated submissions. Many contests require disclosure. If the rules say no AI, then no AI, even for brainstorming.

My personal take. AI is a tool like Grammarly, Scrivener, or a word processor. There’s no shame in using it. There is shame in pretending you wrote what AI wrote. Use the tools, do the work, edit relentlessly, ship the book. The reader’s experience is what matters in the end.

The bigger ethics question is not whether you used AI. It’s whether the book is good. A boring, AI-flavored novel is bad whether or not the author touched a model. A great novel is great even if AI helped draft it. Make the great one.

Pricing Comparison (2026)

The honest math: $40/month gets you a serious AI writing stack in 2026 (Claude Pro plus Sudowrite Hobby). $20/month gets you Claude Pro alone, which covers 80% of what most writers need. $0/month with the free tiers and Creativindie’s free tools gets you further than most paid setups did two years ago.

My Recommendation: The 2026 AI Writing Stack

Here’s my actual setup right now.

Layer 1 — Thinking and revision: Claude Pro ($20/mo). For outlining, structural analysis, line editing, prompt engineering, and any task where I need to talk through the work. Claude is the smartest model on the market for creative analysis as of 2026, and the project workspace makes it easy to keep a book’s worth of context loaded.

Layer 2 — Fiction drafting: NovelCrafter ($14-20/mo with my own API key). For the actual scene-by-scene work on long novels. The codex enforces consistency across chapters in a way that Claude alone can’t, because the AI references your defined characters, factions, and worldbuilding entries on every generation. The setup cost (configuring an OpenRouter key) is annoying for the first hour, but it pays off in the next year of writing.

Layer 3 — Voice cleanup: Creativindie’s /apps/humanizer. After every AI-assisted draft, I run the chapter through the humanizer to flag and rewrite the obvious AI tells: em-dash overuse, three-item lists, “navigating challenges,” generic metaphors. This is the unsexy step that separates publishable AI-assisted prose from slop.

Layer 4 — Slop detection: /apps/aichecker. Final pass before publishing. Flags any remaining AI fingerprints. If a chapter scores high on the slop meter, I rewrite the flagged paragraphs from scratch.

Total cost: about $35-40/month for the paid layers, plus the free tools. That’s roughly the cost of a single Starbucks habit, and it does more for my output than a year of writing courses.

If you only have $20: Claude Pro. If you only have $0: ChatGPT free tier plus Creativindie’s free /apps/ suite. Either of those is enough to write a real book if you do the work.

Common AI Writing Mistakes (How to Avoid Them)

These are the dead giveaways. Hunt them in your drafts and kill them on sight. The link to /apps/aichecker at the end will catch most of them automatically, but you should also train your eye.

1. Em-dash overuse. AI loves em-dashes. Two per paragraph, three per page, everywhere a comma or period would do. If your draft has more em-dashes than your favorite human author’s books, you have an AI problem. Replace at least 70% with commas, semicolons, or new sentences.

2. The “dig / mix / detailed / proof / key / compelling” vocabulary. These words are AI tells. Real writers use them occasionally; AI scatters them everywhere. Banned in my drafts: dig, mix, detailed, proof, key, compelling, specific, multi-layered, complete guide, sharpen, serious. Search-and-destroy after every draft.

3. Three-item lists everywhere. AI defaults to triadic structure. Bigger, brighter, bolder. Faster, smarter, cheaper. The market was loud, crowded, and overwhelming. When every sentence is a three-item list, the prose feels mechanical. Mix in two-item or single-item sentences. Variety beats rhythm-by-rote.

4. Always “navigating challenges.” Generic motion verbs paired with abstract nouns. Navigating challenges, exploring opportunities, embracing change, fostering growth. This is the LinkedIn dialect of AI prose. Replace with specific physical verbs and concrete nouns. Don’t navigate — walk, drag, climb, refuse.

5. Sudden topic pivots. AI will sometimes change topic mid-paragraph because the model lost the thread. Read every paragraph for coherence. If a sentence doesn’t follow logically from the one before it, rewrite the transition or cut the second sentence.

6. Bland metaphors and seasonal emotions. Her sadness was an autumn rain. His anger was a winter storm. These are AI’s default emotional metaphors. They’re not wrong, exactly; they’re just generic. Replace with specific, weird, lived metaphors that only your character would think.

7. Fake-balanced takes. AI hedges. Every observation gets softened with “though some might disagree” or “while there are merits on both sides.” Real voice takes a position. Be willing to be wrong.

8. Bland openings. AI loves opening with throat-clearing: In today’s rapidly changing world, writers face many challenges. Cut every opening sentence that could fit on any other article. Lead with the friction.

For a deeper diagnostic, run your draft through /apps/aichecker/ — it flags these patterns automatically and suggests rewrites.

FAQ — AI Writing Tools

Q: What’s the best AI writing tool for fiction in 2026? Sudowrite for scene-level drafting (Muse 1.5 model is genuinely better than general LLMs at fiction prose), Claude Pro for structural analysis and revision, NovelCrafter if you write series and need codex consistency. Most working novelists use two of these together.

Q: Can I write a whole book with AI? Technically yes. Practically, the result will be unreadable unless you edit relentlessly. AI handles individual scenes; it does not handle the cumulative emotional and structural weight of a 90,000-word novel. Plan to keep maybe 30-50% of the AI’s raw output, rewriting the rest.

Q: Sudowrite vs ChatGPT — which is better for fiction? Sudowrite for the actual prose generation and the scene-by-scene workflow. ChatGPT for brainstorming, outlining, and dialogue experimentation. Different jobs. If you can only afford one and you’re writing novels, Sudowrite. If you write across genres and need versatility, ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro.

Q: Is there a free AI writing tool that’s actually good? The free tier of ChatGPT in 2026 is genuinely usable. Claude’s free tier is excellent for revision. Creativindie’s /apps/aiwriter is free and works well for drafting. NovelAI’s free tier is light but real. Hemingway AI’s free tier handles readability passes.

Q: How do I avoid sounding like AI in my writing? Edit ruthlessly. Read aloud. Cut every sentence that could fit on another writer’s page. Hunt the patterns in section 11 above (em-dashes, “dig,” three-item lists, fake balance). Run drafts through /apps/aichecker to flag what you missed. The skill is editing, not prompting.

Q: Which AI is best at maintaining character voice? Claude is the strongest at voice matching when given a sample of your style. Sudowrite Muse 1.5 holds voice within a single scene better than general LLMs. NovelCrafter’s codex helps enforce voice across long projects. None are perfect — voice consistency past 50,000 words still requires human oversight.

Q: Will Amazon flag my book for using AI? Amazon doesn’t ban AI-assisted books. They require disclosure during publishing. There are three categories: fully AI-generated, AI-assisted (you wrote it, AI edited it), or human only. Mark accurately. The risk is not Amazon penalizing you. The risk is reviewers spotting AI tells and tanking your reviews.

Q: How many AI writing tools do I actually need? For most writers, one or two. A general LLM (Claude or ChatGPT) plus optionally one fiction-specific tool (Sudowrite or NovelCrafter). Buying four tools you don’t use is the most common waste in this space.

Q: Do AI detectors actually work? They flag AI patterns but produce a lot of false positives. As an author, the more useful question is: does my prose pass the human read-aloud test? If a real reader can tell, you have rewriting to do. If they can’t, the detector score is mostly noise. /apps/aichecker is calibrated for spotting the patterns that actually signal AI authorship to readers.

Q: Should I use AI for my book blurb? Yes — this is one of the strongest use cases. Blurbs are short, structured, and benefit from generating 10 versions and picking the best beats. Use Jasper or ChatGPT for blurbs specifically. Don’t use Sudowrite (wrong tool for marketing copy).

Related Resources

• 25 Best Writing Apps and Software for Authors — the bigger picture on writing tools beyond AI
• /apps/humanizer — strip AI tells from your draft, free
• /apps/aichecker — flag AI fingerprints in your own writing, free
• /apps/aiwriter — lightweight free drafting tool, no signup
• AI Story Generators for Fiction Writers (2026) — deeper dive on the fiction-specific tools
• Best Editing Software — ProWritingAid vs Grammarly for after the AI draft
• Writing Prompts & Story Generator — free, two billion combinations
• Bestseller Blueprint Course — for the long-term play

Where to start

If you want the shortcut, here’s where to start.

Free, today: Open /apps/aiwriter and draft a chapter. Then run it through /apps/humanizer to strip the AI tells. Then run it through /apps/aichecker to catch what slipped through. Three free tools, no signup, no subscription. That’s a real workflow.

If you’re serious: Grab the Bestseller Blueprint — it covers what AI can’t teach you: positioning, covers, launch, the actual marketing that turns a finished manuscript into a book people read.

AI accelerates the writing. Positioning and craft decide whether anybody cares. Both matter. Most writers obsess about the first one and ignore the second one until it’s too late. Don’t be most writers.

Derek Murphy

Derek Murphy has a PhD in Literature, is a USA Today and Wall Street Journal bestselling author, and has spent over a decade helping authors write, publish, and sell books through Creativindie. When he’s not critiquing manuscripts or building writing tools, he’s probably in a castle somewhere with cats.