5 common book cover design myths most indie authors believe

5 common book cover design myths most indie authors believe

Book-RedI’ve been designing covers for a few years, and I often have to confront cover design myths perpetuated by indie-publishing gurus and thought leaders.

There’s a lot of advice out there for indie authors, and some of it is contradictory, which has the unfortunate effect of allowing indie authors to accept the advice they like and agree with, and ignore the stuff they don’t want to think about.

My views on book cover design aren’t in sync with the general pulse of the indie publishing community – but keep in mind that:

1. most of the indie publishing community are not book designers

2. most self-published books have pretty awful book covers

3. an extremely small percentage of indie authors are actually making a living

I feel like I’m battling a hydra (multi-headed dragon whose heads grow back) as I constantly deal with new authors over the same issues, so I thought I’d share this post to bust a few myths and possibly change some paradigms.

So here are some things I think most indie authors secretly believe about book cover design, and why they’re totally wrong.

1. The book cover doesn’t matter

I know I know, everybody in the self-publishing industry keeps saying how important book cover design really is. But it’s one piece of advice that authors are quick to dismiss. Sure, they think, I know the book cover is important. But I don’t want to spend a lot of money right now. I’ll just hire someone cheap. Or I’ll make it myself. It just has to be good enough – the story is what’s really important. And after I’m successful, I can afford a better cover.

Why it’s wrong: packaging is everything. Authors approach me every day, saying how hard they’ve been marketing and pushing their books everywhere, and it’s all so difficult, and they don’t know what they should do. If you have an ugly, homemade cover, everything you do to promote your book is a waste of time. You may be successful if you work hard enough, long enough, and if your story is good enough. But you’re shooting yourself in the foot and then going to the ball.

Note: if it isn’t the cover, then you don’t have enough reviews. If you have enough reviews and a great cover, and it’s still not selling, it’s probably your story. Which means – even if you buy and amazing cover, your book will still fail if it’s poorly written, or nobody is interested in it. You can’t sell something people don’t want to read.

2. The cover I made myself is great. Everybody says so.

I’m not against DIY book covers. I’m all for indie authors saving money and taking control. The problem is most indie authors have a terrible sense of design, and make their cover according to their emotional whims and flights of fancy, rather than what sells. Authors tell me all the time “I’m a writer, not a designer” but then take control of the process, tell me exactly what they want me to make, and ignore my protestations.

You may be pretty proud of what you were able to accomplish in publisher or gimp. But it’s probably not good enough. Don’t ask your friends or family: they will lie to you to spare your feelings. Paying someone $5 on fiverr.com will probably result in a better cover than one you’ve made yourself. You can’t trust your own judgment. Even (or especially) if you love the cover, it may not sell well. Get a damn good designer and trust them, or find a few friends who have thousands of Facebook followers and ask them to post your cover for some really critical feedback. (If you still think your cover is awesome, make sure you’re not making these mistakes.)

Note: I made my own cover for my first self-published book 10 years ago. I spent months. I agonized and obsessed over every detail. I kept asking my friends and family for reaffirmation, excited and glowing. It was busy and hideous. I redid it and made a slight less ugly (but still terrible) new edition. After designing almost a thousand book covers, I’m beginning to think I know what I’m doing.

3. The title needs to be legible as a thumbnail

I hear this one all the time: “the title font or subtitle or author name can’t be read easily as a thumbnail. And nobody will buy the book if they can’t read it immediately from the thumbnail size.” It’s bogus. Next time you’re on Amazon browsing books, notice your own behavior. If you see a book that looks interesting, do you squint and read all the tiny text on the thumbnail, or do you read the big, clear text right under the cover?


Take a look at these bestselling book covers – you can’t make out the title in all of them. You can’t read the author name in all of them. And you don’t need to, because that info is right there staring you in the face. What you can tell, immediately, even at thumbnail size, is that these are all stylish, high quality, well designed book covers.

Focus on the design, the colors, the arrangement – you want your cover (even as a thumbnail) to make an emotional statement that resonates with readers. The text doesn’t matter – as long as it looks well designed. If it looks good, they’ll click on it, and then they get to see the full cover in all its majesty.

Don’t screw up a cover design by trying to make the thumbnail legible.

Indie authors mess this up by using huge text (in some genres, like thriller, big text is fine. But not in all. And small text can be nice too).

What this advice really boils down to is, don’t make rookie design mistakes that are obvious even in thumbnail view, like using too much dropshadow or bevel, or using boring common fonts, or crowding the text, or clashing colors, or poorly photoshopped elements, or putting dark red text on a black background.

Design matters. Text legibility doesn’t.

Note: Some readers have pointed out this isn’t true for some mobile devices, which only show the thumbnail. However, I counter that people still click on the thumbnails if they want more information. You don’t want them to be able to read everything, shrug and move on. You want them to say “Huh, what’s that?” and click your thumbnail so they can actually learn more about the book. Thumbnails get clicked based on design, colors and emotions – not because of the book’s title or author (unless they are pre-known to the reader).

4. Amazon knows best (book size ratio and previewer)

Amazon recommends a 1.6 ratio – the same ratio as a 5″x8″ book. So if you designed a cover for 5″x8″, you’d be done. But most of my authors are choosing 6″x9″ books, which is a 1.5 ratio. Often, they want to switch and follow Amazon’s guidelines, because certainly “Amazon knows best.”

Personally, I think Amazon’s preferred ratio is too tall and thin, and a ratio of 1.5 looks more like a traditional book to me. My guess is Amazon wants books to look good on smartphones, especially iPhones, and the deviously tricky iPhone5, which has a very tall, narrow screen.

Maybe Amazon is expecting all digital devices to copy the iPhone 5, but that’s probably not going to happen. Maybe they are pushing to get people reading on their smartphones instead of Kindles devices, because millions and millions of people use only their smartphone and will not buy a digital book reader.

iPhone 5 Guide 300x288 Why I disagree with Amazons recommended book cover dimensions

But for the people who do have Kindles and other e-reading devices, Amazon’s preferred 1.6 ratio is an ill-fit, leaving too much space on the sides. And even on cell phones, where the display size is already pretty small, the 1.6 ratio has drawbacks: to fit in the extra height, the book cover displays even smaller, making the text more difficult to read.

This is probably why most traditional publishers and major bestsellers ignore Amazon’s recommended ratio.

1.5, or even wider, almost square-shaped covers, are far more common.

Interestingly it seems self-published and indie books are more likely to use Amazon’s 1.6 standards, because they are concerned with doing everything just right, and have less confidence to ignore recommendations.

This paradoxically means self-publishing authors are making their books appear self-published by following rather than flouting Amazon’s advice.

And it really doesn’t matter!

Amazon’s recommended book cover ratio doesn’t really matter at all, because Amazon is not the only player in the ebook publishing wars. This means that all devices need to be able to handle all different kinds of books. So what you actually see on ebook readers is that they automatically adjust to display covers of a variety of sizes and ratios.

IMG 7922 1024x768 Why I disagree with Amazons recommended book cover dimensions

In this picture, the 2nd book “Trust the Process” which is one of the thinnest book on my Kindle, is still not quite as thin as a 1.6 ratio. “The Business of Belief” is probably 1.5, and most of the others look even more box-shaped, and may be 1.4 or so.

The other issue I get brought up all the time is “Createspace’s cover previewer flagged issues with my book.” If you’re uploading a PDF, either for the POD book cover or interior, Createspace has an instant preview tool, which can be pretty useful, although I also think it’s overly sensitive.

It can help flag issues, but you won’t really know how the book looks until you print it out.

I often have to tell authors to just ignore the tool and print the book, so they can see that everything looks OK.

I especially hate that Createspace’s guidelines prohibit text elements going off the margins. So for example, if you have an elegant, curly font, it will almost never fit on the spine because Createspace demands unreasonable spine margins, so you have to make the spine title very small or change the font (or cut off the text, which is ugly).


The previewer can be helpful, but it’s just a machine.

5. I should put “Award Winning” or “Bestselling” on my cover

You’ve chosen an obscure Amazon category and got 10 of your friends to buy it at the same time, and it was #1 in that category for 5 minutes. So why not just write “Bestseller”? Because of the law of disappointed expectations. If you have a plain, unpretentious book cover, people won’t expect that much. Which means they will be pleasantly surprised, leading to more shares and a higher review. On the other hand, the more you “sell” it with false pretenses like “BESTSELLER”, the more critically and harshly they will read (higher expectations are harder to meet) so you’ll get less positive reviews and shares.

Readers and also becoming more savvy to the ploys of desperate indie authors. Don’t oversell your book. Let readers discover it for themselves. “Bestseller” doesn’t mean much, until you can back it up with real data, like “4 weeks on the NY Times best-selling list.” Even then, it may do more harm than good. Reader reviews count the most, and you’ll get more positive ones by soft-selling.


The same goes for awards – however: awards contests can be good to enter, as they can mean extra visibility for your book. And some of them are quite well known and even prestigious. If you win an award (first place…I probably wouldn’t brag about getting 2nd place, finalist or runner-up) you may want to add it to your book. But unfortunately, most book award seals and logos are very likely to clash with and destroy your cover design. Book award seals can interrupt the emotional connection your cover is trying to make. It’s in the way, which means it’s killing the sale.

It’s much nicer to add WINNER OF THE SUPER-EXCELLENT BOOK AWARD across the top or across the bottom, above or below the author name, in very small text. But unless it’s a pretty well known award, and unless you won first place, I don’t think it’s likely to drive sales (if it wasn’t the deciding factor – as in they were just about to click away when they saw it and decided to buy – I wouldn’t use it.)

A blurb, book review or a well written teaser will mostly likely drive more sales than a “Book Award Winner” notice.

Note: As I mentioned, a lot of what I’m saying goes against common indie publishing rhetoric, which is why it needs to be said. You’re welcome to challenge my opinions in the comments.

[yellowbox]Want to make your own awesome book cover in MS Word? Click here.[/yellowbox]


  • Derek Murphy Posted

    Thanks for the comment! Good luck publishing, now is definitely the time to do it.

  • Greg Posted

    Good post. I think a lot of authors have to make mistakes to learn, and homemade covers are often one of the first, and most noticeable. I think it can set an author back months, and I’m sure guilty of doing it in the past. They should really be viewed more as an investment, and I view them as a business expense.

    What I think surprises most new authors is that great covers don’t have to cost an arm and a leg. There are plenty of great places to get covers cheap, not just Fiverr.

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      I agree – it’s very possible to get a nice looking and cheap cover. I probably include authors too much in the process, listening to what they want and making the changes they recommend (ending up with a not-so-great cover). It’s such a long, involved process and authors can be so fickle, I have to charge a lot because I know I’m entering into a long relationship and hundreds of revisions. It’s better to view it as a business, and authors can rarely make smart cover design choices since they’re so intimate with the story.

  • Derek Murphy Posted

    I see a lot of authors marketing really really hard, without a good cover or any reviews… but perhaps worse is if they have some good reviews and a nice cover, but underneath the story isn’t so strong. It’s a sinkhole…

  • Derek Murphy Posted

    That’s a very good point; I just upgraded my iphone to ios7 and it shows a small thumbnail next to larger description text. I’d counter that people don’t click on thumbnails because the title or author name is interesting (and they don’t NOT click on thumbnails because the title and author name aren’t interesting.) They click on covers that convey, through styles, fonts and colors, that the book fits a genre and has a theme and that appeals to them. And I’m not saying, hide the text or make it tiny. Just don’t sacrifice the ‘real’, full view, actual cover by making sure everything shows up on the thumbnail. Big publishers obviously aren’t designing for thumbnail size, why are indie authors?

  • Amy Valentini Posted

    I like the way you think. Thank you! 🙂

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      Ha – me too when the thinking’s good.

  • Linda Adams Posted

    Seconding #1, since I’ve seen some truly horrible covers like the red text against the white background. That one practically said “Don’t bother reading me.” It said the author didn’t even try on his cover, which probably meant he didn’t try on his book.

    Most people don’t have good judgment when it comes to graphics. I’ve done graphics for a living and am visual spatial. I am always amazed at the ability of people to gravitate straight to THE WORST graphic they could find. With books, you have to take it account additional things like the genre. It does little good to slap clip art of a peaceful snowy field on an action-packed thriller. I think a lot of people don’t believe it matters that much, but really, it’s the first impression. If you walk into an interview looking like you fell down a hill and rolled around in the mud, you probably already lost the job. If your cover looks like you slapped it on, you probably already lost the sale.

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      Yup – it’s hard for me to tell sometimes… I tend to prefer YA supernatural fiction, so that’s the ‘style’ of covers I like. People who appreciate simple Western novels or traditional adult thrillers may not like my covers as much…

  • Bryan Au Posted

    Great Advice! I also recommend going to a bookstore and looking at all the books taking note of what you like or don’t like and absorbing. I designed my own cover for my RAW IN TEN MINUTES book in 2004 but a major cell phone company suspiciously has a VERY SIMILAR design for their phone in 2007! So I guess my bookcover was pretty good for a self published Author! LOL now I got a major publishing deal after years of my self published RAW IN TEN MINUTES sold very well. The cover is everything!

  • Ken Posted

    I dig everything you are saying, but I have to say that your choice of a picture at the top of this blog is annoying and disorienting. I could not scroll fast enough to get it out of my field of vision. My first thought was that it made me doubt if this guy knows what he is talking about. I read on in spite of the bad (really bad) first impression. What gives?

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      You mean the image of the field and the legs? It’s interesting that you react to it that way. You’re probably right – it is an uncomfortable image. It’s a view of the world you’re not used to experiencing. It may make you feel out of control, dizzy, disoriented. But then again, that’s kind of the point of this blog as well: to make you see things in a new light, to go outside of your comfort zone and be open to new ideas that may improve your life. Maybe the image somehow “screens out” people who aren’t ready to make this journey with me… but mostly I just picked an image I liked. I’ll keep my eye out for something better. Thanks for bringing my attention to this.

  • TBO Posted

    For me, worse than the chessy covers is the indy-author’s idea that editing doesn’t matter. There are too many really awful books out there in dire need of editing, and authors who say, “I can’t afford it.”

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      That’s a timely comment, considering there’s a heated discussion about this right now after I posted a couple articles suggesting indie authors could skip editing. In brief: the story is more important than the cleanliness. You can pay a lot of money to fix all the errors and improve the writing and the book will still fail if it doesn’t have a good story, which is why I can’t recommend every author pay thousands of dollars to edit every book. Maybe they should have saved up for editing before they tried to publish, but I’m not going to be the one who tells them they shouldn’t be allowed to publish badly written slop unless they can afford to dish out for professional editing. If they publish crap, it will fail, they’ll learn. Or maybe they’ll succeed anyway because they have a great story and beta readers offer to proofread it.

  • Jennifer M Anderson Posted

    I’m not the author of this blog, but I am an independent publisher, so I’ll give you the heads up. Your editor will give you the format they want the book to be sent in. This will usually be in either PDF format or Word. They will let you know.

  • Richard Milton Posted

    Derek, your advice, ideas and suggestions are very helpful – but I must take issue with you over the readability of Amazon thumbnail covers. To be frank, your contrarian stand on this comes across as setting up an alibi for cover designers who are unable to make covers that are legible at this small size. I’m astounded that you can seriously suggest it doesn’t matter whether the title is readable at thumbnail size, because this is in many cases the only size that a book browser will see. Their attention is not going to be arrested by a jumble of colours no matter how well-designed it may be at full size. I’ve demanded my money back from two designers because they were unable to do this simple and to my mind essential task. I feel this is one of those cases where the craftsman has just one job – to convey the book’s title to a reader.

    • Derek Murphy Posted

      Thanks Richard, nice to see you on my blog. You’re welcome to your own ideas. Most of your covers are quite good; but that’s because the text fits the genre and isn’t trying to be huge. “Dead Secret” just barely works, because of the strong picture, even though the red text is big and plain.

      On the other hand, “The Glass Harmonica” makes exactly the mistake you are defending – big, bold, plain fonts that are legible as a thumbnail but don’t fit the genre and are not attractive to the target readers. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25048153-the-glass-harmonica

      I would caution against making your own assumptions about how potential buyers interact with your book cover design, if you haven’t done your own split testing and case studies to back up your opinion. I’m pretty confident you are sabotaging your own cover design by focusing on text legibility, which is exactly what I urge authors not to do in this article. The book cover design IS NOT TO CONVEY THE TITLE TO THE READER. That’s a completely false ideology of book cover design; it’s not what the cover is meant to do. If you think it is – or you want it to be – that’s your choice, but you’ll be hurting your own book sales. I’m obviously not going to be swayed in my viewpoint, because my livelihood depends on being right and helping clients sell more books. If your cover doesn’t attract their attention with the images only – and appeal to the right readers – then it has already failed and the text won’t matter. (The text style and fonts should be attractive and appealing even if not entirely legible.)

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *